Clinical outcome following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)


Objectives: To determine the prevalence of impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function and its impact on the in-hospital and long-term outcome in patients who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Background: Although impaired LV function may be considered a contra-indication for aortic valve replacement, the hemodynamic characteristics of transcatheter valves may offer procedural and long-term clinical benefit in such patients. Methods: 230 consecutive patients underwent TAVI with the Medtronic-CoreValve System. Impaired LV function was defined by a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) = 35% (European Multicenter Study on Operative Risk Stratification and Long-term Outcome in patients with Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis). Study endpoints were selected and defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium recommendations. Results: Compared with patients with a LVEF > 35% (n = 197), those with LVEF = 35% (n = 33) were more often male (78.8 % vs. 46.7%, P < 0.001), more symptomatic (NYHA class III or IV, 97.0% vs. 77.2%, P = 0.008) and had a higher prevalence of prior coronary artery disease (63.6% vs. 43.1%, P = 0.029). The Logistic EuroSCORE was 14.8% and 22.8, respectively (P = 0.012). No difference was observed between the two groups in in-hospital or 30-day mortality (3.0% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.21), the Combined Safety Endpoint at 30 days (24.2% and 24.4%, P = 0.99) and survival free from readmission at one year (69.2% and 69.7%, P = 0.85). After adjustment, LVEF = 35% was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality, in-hospital complications and survival free from readmission at follow-up. Conclusion: The immediate and long-term outcome after TAVI did not differ between patients with an impaired and preserved LVEF. LVEF = 35% did not predict adverse immediate and long-term outcome. These findings suggest that TAVI should not be withheld in selected patients with impaired LV function. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)702-710
Number of pages9
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Cite this