Abstract
Objective: Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants are at an increased risk of long-term cognitive impairment. Early identification and timely interventions are important. We aimed to validate the Dutch version of the revised Parent Report of Children's Abilities (PARCA-R) questionnaire. Methods: The subjects were survivors from the Belgian participating centers to the NIRTURE trial. As part of a study-related follow-up, PARCA-R was sent out at the age of 2 years. As part of a normal hospital follow-up, these infants were assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development - second edition (BSID-II) at the age of 9, 18 and 36. months. MRI was performed at term in the group of VLBW infants of ZOL Genk as standard care. Results: PARCA-R was sent out to 193 surviving infants. BSID-II was performed in 36% (n = 70) at 9. months, in 30% (n = 58) at 18. months and in 12% (n = 23) at 36. months. MRI was available for 32 infants. We received 86 responses to the PARCA-R. Parent report composite (PRC) scores were significantly correlated with the Mental Development Index (MDI) (p < 0.0001 (9 months); p = 0.003 (18 months); p = 0.01 (36. months)). PRC scores were significantly lower in those with an abnormal MRI (92 vs.124; p = 0.04). Conclusion: We support the use of the PARCA-R as a time and cost efficient alternative for identifying cognitive delay. Practice implications: We suggest that the combination of BSID-II, MRI at term and PARCA-R would be the ideal testing method for identifying VLBW infants at risk for cognitive developmental delay by two years of age.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 897-900 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Early Human Development |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive assessment of very low birth weight infants using the Dutch version of the PARCA-R parent questionnaire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver