Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: differences between males and females

Nadia Garnefski, Jan Teerds, Vivian Kraaij, Jeroen Legerstee, Tessa van den Kommer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

286 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study focuses on comparability of men and women in (a) the extent to which they use specific cognitive emotion regulation strategies in response to the experience of life stress and (b) the extent to which the use of these strategies is related to the reporting of depressive symptoms. In a general population sample of 251 males and 379 females, data were obtained on symptoms of depression and the use of nine cognitive emotion regulation strategies. Significant differences were found in the strategies Rumination, Catastrophizing and Positive refocusing: women reported to use these strategies more often than men. However, no differences were found in the extent to which specific cognitive strategies were related to the reporting of depressive symptomatology. In both groups, higher extents of reporting self-blame, rumination and/or catastrophizing as strategies were strongly related to higher depression scores, whereas higher extents of using positive reappraisal were related to lower depression scores. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-276
Number of pages10
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: differences between males and females'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this