Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”

Caroline B. Terwee; Lidwine B. Mokkink; Lisan Hidding; Teatske M. Altenburg; Mireille N.M. VAN Poppel; M. J. M.  Chinapaw

doi:10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8

Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”

Caroline B. Terwee^*, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Lisan Hidding, Teatske M. Altenburg, Mireille N.M. VAN Poppel, M. J. M. Chinapaw

^*Corresponding author for this work

VU University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Our main proposition is that this field can learn much from the field of quality of life research and the methodology developed for validating quality of life questionnaires.

Original language	English
Article number	66
Journal	International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Volume	13
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8
Publication status	Published - 10 Jun 2016
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8Licence: CC BY

Comment_on_Should_we_reframe_how_we_think_about_physical_activity_and_sedentary_behavior_measurement_Validity_and_reliability_reconsidered_.pdfFinal published version, 293 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Hidding, L., Altenburg, T. M., VAN Poppel, M. N. M., & Chinapaw, M. J. M. (2016). Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 13, Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8

@article{b9410e9969a8465593a4818092f11458,

title = "Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”",

abstract = "With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Our main proposition is that this field can learn much from the field of quality of life research and the methodology developed for validating quality of life questionnaires.",

author = "Terwee, \{Caroline B.\} and Mokkink, \{Lidwine B.\} and Lisan Hidding and Altenburg, \{Teatske M.\} and \{VAN Poppel\}, \{Mireille N.M.\} and Chinapaw, \{M. J. M.\}",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 The Author(s)",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "10",

doi = "10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity",

issn = "1479-5868",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”. / Terwee, Caroline B.; Mokkink, Lidwine B.; Hidding, Lisan et al.
In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 13, 66, 10.06.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”

AU - Terwee, Caroline B.

AU - Mokkink, Lidwine B.

AU - Hidding, Lisan

AU - Altenburg, Teatske M.

AU - VAN Poppel, Mireille N.M.

AU - Chinapaw, M. J. M.

PY - 2016/6/10

Y1 - 2016/6/10

N2 - With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Our main proposition is that this field can learn much from the field of quality of life research and the methodology developed for validating quality of life questionnaires.

AB - With great interest we read the article by Kelly et al. on the measurement of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) (Kelly P et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:(1) 32, 2016). We appreciate the invitation of the authors to provide feedback on their ideas and we take this opportunity to contribute to the discussion. Our main proposition is that this field can learn much from the field of quality of life research and the methodology developed for validating quality of life questionnaires.

U2 - 10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8

DO - 10.1186/s12966-016-0392-8

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 1479-5868

VL - 13

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

M1 - 66

ER -

Comment on “Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behavior measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered”

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this