Comparison of diffusion weighted imaging b0 with T2*-weighted gradient echo or susceptibility weighted imaging for intracranial hemorrhage detection after reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke

Sven P.R. Luijten*, Nadinda A.M. van der Ende, Sandra A.P. Cornelissen, Leo Kluijtmans, Antonius van Hattem, Geert Lycklama a Nijeholt, Alida A. Postma, Reinoud P.H. Bokkers, Lars Thomassen, Ulrike Waje-Andreassen, Nicola Logallo, Serge Bracard, Benjamin Gory, Bob Roozenbeek, Diederik W.J. Dippel, Aad van der Lugt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: 

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) b0 may be able to substitute T2*-weighted gradient echo (GRE) or susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) in case of comparable detection of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), thereby reducing MRI examination time. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of DWI b0 compared to T2*GRE or SWI for detection of ICH after reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke. 

Methods: 

We pooled 300 follow-up MRI scans acquired within 1 week after reperfusion therapy. Six neuroradiologists each rated DWI images (b0 and b1000; b0 as index test) of 100 patients and, after a minimum of 4 weeks, T2*GRE or SWI images (reference standard) paired with DWI images of the same patients. Readers assessed the presence of ICH (yes/no) and type of ICH according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of DWI b0 for detection of any ICH, and the sensitivity for detection of hemorrhagic infarction (HI1 & HI2) and parenchymal hematoma (PH1 & PH2). 

Results: 

We analyzed 277 scans of ischemic stroke patients with complete image series and sufficient image quality (median age 65 years [interquartile range, 54–75], 158 [57%] men). For detection of any ICH on DWI b0, the sensitivity was 62% (95% CI: 50–76) and specificity 96% (95% CI: 93–99). The sensitivity of DWI b0 was 52% (95% CI: 28–68) for detection of hemorrhagic infarction and 84% (95% CI: 70–92) for parenchymal hematoma. 

Conclusion: 

DWI b0 is inferior for detection of ICH compared to T2*GRE/SWI, especially for smaller and more subtle hemorrhages. Follow-up MRI protocols should include T2*GRE/SWI for detection of ICH after reperfusion therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1649-1655
Number of pages7
JournalNeuroradiology
Volume65
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
AP reports institutional grants from Siemens Healthineers and Bayer Healthcare. RB reports funding from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy, and an unrestricted grant from Siemens Healthineers. UWA reports funding from “Helse-Vest” and from the University of Bergen for research. DD and AvdL report funding from the Dutch Heart Foundation, Brain Foundation Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Health Holland Top Sector Life Sciences & Health, and unrestricted grants from Penumbra Inc., Stryker, Medtronic, Thrombolytic Science, LLC and Cerenovus for research, all paid to institution. The other authors report no conflicts.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of diffusion weighted imaging b0 with T2*-weighted gradient echo or susceptibility weighted imaging for intracranial hemorrhage detection after reperfusion therapy for ischemic stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this