Comparison of flail and multiple simple rib fracture patterns among patients included in rib fracture studies; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: 

Comparing baseline characteristics of patients with flail versus multiple simple rib fracture patterns, hypothesizing greater injury severity in the flail group. 

Methods: 

A systematic review of Cochrane Central, Embase, Medline Ovid, and Web of Science identified 66 cohorts from 1,799 records. Random effects models were used, with publication bias assessed via funnel plots. Primary outcome was injury severity score (ISS); secondary outcomes included number and level of fractured ribs and associated injuries. 

Results: 

Patients with flail fractures had significantly higher ISS (mean 27 vs 20; p < 0.05), more fractured ribs (mean 7 vs 4; p < 0.05), and more frequent pulmonary contusion (73 vs 42%), hemothorax (45 vs 20%), and in-hospital mortality (10 vs 2%; p < 0.05). 

Conclusion: 

Flail chest fracture patterns indicate more severe trauma and higher complication rates. Studies should report outcomes for flail and multiple simple rib fracture patterns separately when evaluating rib fracture treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number355
JournalEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Nov 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of flail and multiple simple rib fracture patterns among patients included in rib fracture studies; A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this