Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of socio-economic determinants of COVID-19 testing and positivity in Canada: A multi-provincial analysis

  • Lilia Antonova
  • , Chandy Somayaji
  • , Jillian Cameron
  • , Monica Sirski
  • , Maria E. Sundaram
  • , James Ted McDonald
  • , Sharmistha Mishra
  • , Jeffrey C. Kwong
  • , Alan Katz
  • , Stefan Baral
  • , Lisa Caulley
  • , Andrew Calzavara
  • , Martin Corsten
  • , Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki
  • University of Ottawa
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
  • University of New Brunswick
  • University of Manitoba
  • Marshfield Clinic
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
  • University of Toronto
  • Public Health Ontario
  • University Health Network
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
  • Dalhousie University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: 

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have been more pronounced for socially disadvantaged populations. We sought to determine how access to SARS-CoV-2 testing and the likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19 were associated with demographic factors, socioeconomic status (SES) and social determinants of health (SDH) in three Canadian provinces. 

METHODS: 

An observational population-based cross-sectional study was conducted for the provinces of Ontario, Manitoba and New Brunswick between March 1, 2020 and April 27, 2021, using provincial health administrative data. After excluding residents of long-term care homes, those without current provincial health insurance and those who were tested for COVID-19 out of province, records from provincial healthcare administrative databases were reviewed for 16,900,661 healthcare users. Data was modelled separately for each province in accordance to a prespecified protocol and follow-up consultations among provincial statisticians and collaborators. We employed univariate and multivariate regression models to examine determinants of testing and test results. 

RESULTS: 

After adjustment for other variables, female sex and urban residency were positively associated with testing, while female sex was negatively associated with test positivity. In New Brunswick and Ontario, individuals living in higher income areas were more likely to be tested, whereas in Manitoba higher income was negatively associated with both testing and positivity. High ethnocultural composition was associated with lower testing rates. Both high ethnocultural composition and high situational vulnerability increased the odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. DISCUSSION: We observed that multiple demographic, income and SDH factors were associated with SARS-CoV-2 testing and test positivity. Barriers to healthcare access identified in this study specifically relate to COVID-19 testing but may reflect broader inequities for certain at-risk groups.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0289292
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume18
Issue number8 August
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Aug 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Antonova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of socio-economic determinants of COVID-19 testing and positivity in Canada: A multi-provincial analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this