Abstract
Long-term follow-up after surgical correction of patients with radial polydactyly might reveal unexpected or undesired outcomes that are accentuated by growth. It should be stressed that assessment of outcomes differs considerably by the system used. Preoperative examination can elucidate the underlying pathological anatomy of these anomalies and consequently, these anatomical differences should be corrected as much as possible during the first operation to prevent worse outcomes at long-term follow-up. In various long-term studies, the reoperation rate was in the range of 7%–28%, with the most common reasons being deviation, instability, nail deformity and suboptimal appearance. Most unfavourable results occur during growth and are frequently revealed only at longer-term follow-up. Concentration of care to a few centres is advised since these malformations occur in small numbers and experienced surgeons tend to have better results. Consensus on the used assessment system and multicentred studies are essential in future to better understand how we can prevent reoperations.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 226-239 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Hand Surgery: European Volume |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2 Nov 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2023.