Components in soy allergy diagnostics: Gly m 2S albumin has the best diagnostic value in adults

RJB Klemans, EF Knol, A Michelsen-Huisman, Suzanne Pasmans, W de Kruijf-Broekman, CAFM Bruijnzeel-Koomen, E Hoffen, AC (André) Knulst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BackgroundThus far, four soy allergens have been characterized. Their diagnostic value was assessed only using a case-control design with controls not suspected of soy allergy or in a soy-allergic population without controls. Our objective was to analyze the diagnostic value of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to Gly m 2S albumin, Gly m 4, 5, and 6, and their possible relation with severity or culprit soy product. MethodsAdult patients suspected of soy allergy were included (n=46). Allergy was confirmed by challenge (n=19) or history (n=16) and excluded by challenge in 11 patients. Soy components were analyzed by ImmunoCAP. Diagnostic value was assessed in the challenged patient group by an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). ResultsSpecific immunoglobulin E to Gly m 2S albumin had the highest AUC (0.79), comparable to skin prick test (SPT) and sIgE to soy extract (0.76 and 0.77, respectively). All patients were sensitized to either soy extract or Gly m 4 (sIgE0.35kU/l). sIgE to soy extract, Gly m 5, and Gly m 6 was significantly higher in patients with mild symptoms (P=0.04, 0.02 and 0.02, respectively). Patients only reacting to soy milk had higher sIgE levels to Gly m 4 (median 9.8 vs 1.1 kU/l, P=0.01). ConclusionSpecific immunoglobulin E to Gly m 2S albumin had the best accuracy in diagnosing soy allergy. Gly m 5 and 6 were related to mild symptoms. Higher levels of Gly m 4 were related to allergy to soy milk.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)1396-1402
Number of pages7
JournalAllergy
Volume68
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Research programs

  • EMC MM-02-72-03
  • EMC MM-03-61-05-A

Cite this