Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery

Diane Pecher*, Saskia van Dantzig, Hendrik N.J. Schifferstien

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to theories of grounded cognition, conceptual representation and perception share processing mechanisms. We investigated whether this overlap is due to conscious perceptual imagery. Participants filled out questionnaires to assess the vividness of their imagery (Questionnaire on Mental Imagery) and the extent to which their imagery was object oriented and spatially oriented (Object-Spatial Imagery Questionnaire), and they performed a mental rotation task. One week later, they performed a verbal property verification task. In this task, involvement of modality-specific systems is evidenced by the modality-switch effect, the finding that performance on a target trial (e.g., apple-green) is better after a same-modality trial (e.g., diamond-sparkle) than after a different-modality trial (e.g., airplane-noisy). Results showed a modality-switch effect, but there was no systematic relation between imagery scores and modality switch. We conclude that conscious mental imagery is not fundamental to conceptual representation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)914-919
Number of pages6
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant to D.P. from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO).

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Concepts are not represented by conscious imagery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this