Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

M Cecconi, D De Backer, M Antonelli, R Beale, Jan Bakker, C Hofer, R Jaeschke, A Mebazaa, MR Pinsky, JL Teboul, JL Vincent, A Rhodes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

904 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Circulatory shock is a life-threatening syndrome resulting in multiorgan failure and a high mortality rate. The aim of this consensus is to provide support to the bedside clinician regarding the diagnosis, management and monitoring of shock. The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine invited 12 experts to form a Task Force to update a previous consensus (Antonelli et al.: Intensive Care Med 33:575-590, 2007). The same five questions addressed in the earlier consensus were used as the outline for the literature search and review, with the aim of the Task Force to produce statements based on the available literature and evidence. These questions were: (1) What are the epidemiologic and pathophysiologic features of shock in the intensive care unit? (2) Should we monitor preload and fluid responsiveness in shock? (3) How and when should we monitor stroke volume or cardiac output in shock? (4) What markers of the regional and microcirculation can be monitored, and how can cellular function be assessed in shock? (5) What is the evidence for using hemodynamic monitoring to direct therapy in shock? Four types of statements were used: definition, recommendation, best practice and statement of fact. Forty-four statements were made. The main new statements include: (1) statements on individualizing blood pressure targets; (2) statements on the assessment and prediction of fluid responsiveness; (3) statements on the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic monitoring. This consensus provides 44 statements that can be used at the bedside to diagnose, treat and monitor patients with shock.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)1795-1815
Number of pages21
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume40
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Cite this