Continuous vital sign monitoring in patients after elective abdominal surgery: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes and costs

Heleen Vroman*, Diederik Mosch, Frank Eijkenaar, Elke Naujokat, Belinda Mohr, Goran Medic, Marcel Swijnenburg, Eric Tesselaar, Martijn Franken

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: To assess changes in outcomes and costs upon implementation of continuous vital sign monitoring in postsurgical patients. Materials & methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and in-hospital costs compared with a control period. Results: During the intervention period patients were less frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.004), had shorter length of stay (p < 0.001) and lower costs (p < 0.001). The intervention was associated with a lower odds of ICU admission (odds ratio: 0.422; p = 0.007) and ICU related costs (odds ratio: -662.4; p = 0.083). Conclusion: Continuous vital sign monitoring may have contributed to fewer ICU admissions and lower ICU costs in postsurgical patients.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere220176
JournalJournal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume12
Issue number2
Early online date16 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

©2023 The Authors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Continuous vital sign monitoring in patients after elective abdominal surgery: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes and costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this