TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Necessary condition analysis (NCA): review of research topics and guidelines for good practice (Review of Managerial Science, (2023), 17, 2, (683-714), 10.1007/s11846-023-00628-x)
AU - Dul, Jan
AU - Hauff, Sven
AU - Bouncken, Ricarda B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - In the original publication, the first name of the Author Sven Hauff was spelled incorrectly. The correct first name should be Sven. The correct Author group has been provided below: Jan Dul1, Sven Hauff2, Ricarda B. Bouncken3 In Table 3 of this article, there was a formatting error which has been corrected. The revised Table 3 is provided below. (Table presented.) Options to present the bottleneck table Data from van der Valk et al. (2016) Innovation (percentage range) Contractual detail (percentage range) Goodwill trust (percentage range) Competence trust (percentage range) Innovation (actual) Contractual detail (actual) Goodwill trust (actual) Competence trust (actual) Innovation (actual) Contractual detail (percentile) Goodwill trust (percentile) Competence trust (percentile) Y X1 X2 X3 Y X1 X2 X3 Y X1 X2 X3 0 NN NN NN 1 NN NN NN 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 NN NN NN 1.4 NN NN NN 1.4 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 20 NN NN NN 1.8 NN NN NN 1.8 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 30 NN NN NN 2.2 NN NN NN 2.2 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 40 NN NN NN 2.6 NN NN NN 2.6 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 50 NN NN NN 3.0 NN NN NN 3.0 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 60 8.3 2.2 NN 3.4 2.2 2.5 NN 3.4 8.3 (4) 4.2 (2) 0 (0) 70 27.4 35.2 26 3.8 2.9 3.3 3.5 3.8 31.2 (15) 20.8 (10) 27.1 (13) 80 46.5 68.2 54 4.2 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.2 58.3 (28) 68.8 (33) 62.5 (30) 90 65.6 NA 81.9 4.6 4.4 NA 4.6 4.6 81.2 (39) NA (NA) 79.2 (38) 100 84.7 NA NA 5.0 5.1 NA NA 5.0 89.6 (43) NA (NA) NA (NA) The Original version has been corrected.
AB - In the original publication, the first name of the Author Sven Hauff was spelled incorrectly. The correct first name should be Sven. The correct Author group has been provided below: Jan Dul1, Sven Hauff2, Ricarda B. Bouncken3 In Table 3 of this article, there was a formatting error which has been corrected. The revised Table 3 is provided below. (Table presented.) Options to present the bottleneck table Data from van der Valk et al. (2016) Innovation (percentage range) Contractual detail (percentage range) Goodwill trust (percentage range) Competence trust (percentage range) Innovation (actual) Contractual detail (actual) Goodwill trust (actual) Competence trust (actual) Innovation (actual) Contractual detail (percentile) Goodwill trust (percentile) Competence trust (percentile) Y X1 X2 X3 Y X1 X2 X3 Y X1 X2 X3 0 NN NN NN 1 NN NN NN 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 10 NN NN NN 1.4 NN NN NN 1.4 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 20 NN NN NN 1.8 NN NN NN 1.8 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 30 NN NN NN 2.2 NN NN NN 2.2 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 40 NN NN NN 2.6 NN NN NN 2.6 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 50 NN NN NN 3.0 NN NN NN 3.0 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 60 8.3 2.2 NN 3.4 2.2 2.5 NN 3.4 8.3 (4) 4.2 (2) 0 (0) 70 27.4 35.2 26 3.8 2.9 3.3 3.5 3.8 31.2 (15) 20.8 (10) 27.1 (13) 80 46.5 68.2 54 4.2 3.7 4.1 4.1 4.2 58.3 (28) 68.8 (33) 62.5 (30) 90 65.6 NA 81.9 4.6 4.4 NA 4.6 4.6 81.2 (39) NA (NA) 79.2 (38) 100 84.7 NA NA 5.0 5.1 NA NA 5.0 89.6 (43) NA (NA) NA (NA) The Original version has been corrected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150504521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11846-023-00634-z
DO - 10.1007/s11846-023-00634-z
M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor
AN - SCOPUS:85150504521
SN - 1863-6683
VL - 17
SP - 1535
EP - 1537
JO - Review of Managerial Science
JF - Review of Managerial Science
IS - 4
ER -