Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care?: A Mixed-Methods study

Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group; Grada R. Arends; Nina L. Loos; Yara E. van Kooij; Kasia Tabeau; Willemijn A. de Ridder; Ruud W. Selles; Joris Veltkamp; Robbert M. Wouters

doi:10.1007/s11136-024-03724-x

Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study

Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group, Grada R. Arends^*, Nina L. Loos, Yara E. van Kooij, Kasia Tabeau, Willemijn A. de Ridder, Ruud W. Selles, Joris Veltkamp, Robbert M. Wouters

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the original published article, the bottom part of Fig. 2 was missing. Also in the supplementary tables, the last sentence is “A negative standardized odds ratio (SOR) indicates worse understanding and positive SOR indicates better understanding.” and “A negative standardized odds ratio (SOR) indicates less perceived value and positive SOR indicates more perceived value.” However, this should be:

- Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients have a worse understanding of the outcome information and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients have a better understanding of the outcome information. (Supplementary Table 1A) Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information less valuable and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information more valuable (Supplementary Table 1B)

The correct version of Fig. 2 and the Supplementary information file are provided in this correction.

Original language	English
Journal	Quality of Life Research
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03724-x
Publication status	Published - 27 Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

The original article has been corrected.

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1007/s11136-024-03724-xLicence: CC BY

s11136-024-03724-xFinal published version, 972 KBLicence: CC BY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

1 Article

What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study
Arends, G. R., Loos, N., van Kooij, Y., Tabeau, K., de Ridder, W., Selles, R., Veltkamp, J., Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group & Wouters, R., 5 Jun 2024, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Quality of Life Research. 15 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Open Access
File
2 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this

Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group, Arends, G. R., Loos, N. L., van Kooij, Y. E., Tabeau, K., de Ridder, W. A., Selles, R. W., Veltkamp, J., & Wouters, R. M. (2024). Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03724-x

@article{f7d8c518ab244b10802348fe93951c4d,

title = "Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care?: A Mixed-Methods study",

abstract = "In the original published article, the bottom part of Fig. 2 was missing. Also in the supplementary tables, the last sentence is “A negative standardized odds ratio (SOR) indicates worse understanding and positive SOR indicates better understanding.” and “A negative standardized odds ratio (SOR) indicates less perceived value and positive SOR indicates more perceived value.” However, this should be: - Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients have a worse understanding of the outcome information and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients have a better understanding of the outcome information. (Supplementary Table 1A) Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information less valuable and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information more valuable (Supplementary Table 1B) - Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients have a worse understanding of the outcome information and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients have a better understanding of the outcome information. (Supplementary Table 1A) Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information less valuable and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information more valuable (Supplementary Table 1B) The correct version of Fig. 2 and the Supplementary information file are provided in this correction. ",

author = "{Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group} and Arends, {Grada R.} and Loos, {Nina L.} and {van Kooij}, {Yara E.} and Kasia Tabeau and {de Ridder}, {Willemijn A.} and Selles, {Ruud W.} and Joris Veltkamp and Wouters, {Robbert M.}",

note = "The original article has been corrected. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = jul,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1007/s11136-024-03724-x",

language = "English",

journal = "Quality of Life Research",

issn = "0962-9343",

publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group, Arends, GR, Loos, NL , van Kooij, YE , Tabeau, K , de Ridder, WA , Selles, RW, Veltkamp, J & Wouters, RM 2024, 'Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study', Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03724-x

Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study. / Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group; Arends, Grada R.; Loos, Nina L. et al.
In: Quality of Life Research, 27.07.2024.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care?

T2 - A Mixed-Methods study

AU - Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group

AU - Arends, Grada R.

AU - Loos, Nina L.

AU - van Kooij, Yara E.

AU - Tabeau, Kasia

AU - de Ridder, Willemijn A.

AU - Selles, Ruud W.

AU - Veltkamp, Joris

AU - Wouters, Robbert M.

PY - 2024/7/27

Y1 - 2024/7/27

N2 - In the original published article, the bottom part of Fig. 2 was missing. Also in the supplementary tables, the last sentence is “A negative standardized odds ratio (SOR) indicates worse understanding and positive SOR indicates better understanding.” and “A negative standardized odds ratio (SOR) indicates less perceived value and positive SOR indicates more perceived value.” However, this should be: - Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients have a worse understanding of the outcome information and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients have a better understanding of the outcome information. (Supplementary Table 1A) Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information less valuable and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information more valuable (Supplementary Table 1B) - Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients have a worse understanding of the outcome information and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients have a better understanding of the outcome information. (Supplementary Table 1A) Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information less valuable and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information more valuable (Supplementary Table 1B) The correct version of Fig. 2 and the Supplementary information file are provided in this correction.

AB - In the original published article, the bottom part of Fig. 2 was missing. Also in the supplementary tables, the last sentence is “A negative standardized odds ratio (SOR) indicates worse understanding and positive SOR indicates better understanding.” and “A negative standardized odds ratio (SOR) indicates less perceived value and positive SOR indicates more perceived value.” However, this should be: - Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients have a worse understanding of the outcome information and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients have a better understanding of the outcome information. (Supplementary Table 1A) Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information less valuable and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information more valuable (Supplementary Table 1B) - Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients have a worse understanding of the outcome information and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients have a better understanding of the outcome information. (Supplementary Table 1A) Odds ratios smaller than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information less valuable and odds ratios larger than 1.0 indicate patients find outcome information more valuable (Supplementary Table 1B) The correct version of Fig. 2 and the Supplementary information file are provided in this correction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199809785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-024-03724-x

DO - 10.1007/s11136-024-03724-x

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 39066880

AN - SCOPUS:85199809785

SN - 0962-9343

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

ER -

Outcome-Based Healthcare Research Group, Arends GR, Loos NL , van Kooij YE , Tabeau K , de Ridder WA et al. Correction: What are the perspectives of patients with hand and wrist conditions, chronic pain, and patients recovering from stroke on the use of patient and outcome information in everyday care? A Mixed-Methods study. Quality of Life Research. 2024 Jul 27. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03724-x