Correlation between radiological assessment of acute ankle fractures and syndesmotic injury on MRI

John Hermans, N Wentink, A (Annechien) Beumer, Hop, Rien Heijboer, AFCM Moonen, AZ (Abida) Ginai-Karamat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

95 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Owing to the shortcomings of clinical examination and radiographs, injury to the syndesmotic ligaments is often misdiagnosed. When there is no indication requiring that the fractured ankle be operated on, the syndesmosis is not tested intra-operatively, and rupture of this ligamentous complex may be missed. Subsequently the patient is not treated properly leading to chronic complaints such as instability, pain, and swelling. We evaluated three fracture classification methods and radiographic measurements with respect to syndesmotic injury. Prospectively the radiographs of 51 consecutive ankle fractures were classified according to Weber, AO-Muller, and Lauge-Hansen. Both the fracture type and additional measurements of the tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), medial clear space (MCS), and superior clear space (SCS) were used to assess syndesmotic injury. MRI, as standard of reference, was performed to evaluate the integrity of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The sensitivity and specificity for detectio The Weber and AO-Muller fracture classification system, in combination with additional measurements, detected syndesmotic injury with a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 100%, and Lauge-Hansen with both a sensitivity and a specificity of 92%. TFCS and TFO did not correlate with syndesmotic injury, and a widened MCS did not correlate with deltoid ligament injury. Syndesmotic injury as predicted by the Lauge-Hansen fracture classification correlated well with MRI findings. With MRI the extent of syndesmotic injury and therefore fracture stage can be assessed more accurately compared to radiographs.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)787-801
Number of pages15
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-01-66-01

Cite this