Cost comparison study of two different follow-up protocols after surgery for oesophageal cancer

Suzanne Polinder, EML (Els) Verschuur, PD (Peter) Siersema, Ernst Kuipers, Ewout Steyerberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)


Background and aim: Costs of follow-up strategies in patients after surgery for oesophageal cancer have not been evaluated. We therefore randomised 109 patients to standard outpatient clinic follow-up by a surgeon (n = 55) or home visits by a specialist nurse(n = 54) and compared costs between these two strategies. Method: Cost comparisons included comprehensive data on hospital costs, diagnostic interventions and extramural care. Detailed information on health care consumption was obtained from a case record form at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomisation. Results: Total medical costs were lower for nurse-led follow-up ((sic)2592 versus (sic)3798) than standard follow-up, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.11). This advantage in the nurse-led follow-up group was mainly due to lower costs for follow-up visits ((sic)234 versus (sic)503; p < 0.001), and a trend towards lower costs for total intramural care ((sic)1477 versus (sic)2277; p = 0.19). Conclusion: Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal cancer surgery is likely to be cost effective and may even generate cost savings. The results of this study further support a specific role of nurses in the medical care of patients with malignant diseases. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)2110-2115
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Cite this