Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Bypass Surgery for Patients with Left Main Disease: Results from the EXCEL Trial

Elizabeth A. Magnuson*, Khaja Chinnakondepalli, Katherine Vilain, Patrick W. Serruys, Joseph F. Sabik, A. Pieter Kappetein, Gregg W. Stone, David J. Cohen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The EXCEL trial (Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization) demonstrated in patients with left main coronary artery disease, no significant difference between coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-eluting stents for the composite end point of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 5 years. However, all-cause mortality at 5 years was higher with PCI. Long-term cost-effectiveness of these 2 strategies has heretofore not been evaluated. Methods: From 2010 to 2014, 1905 patients with left main coronary artery disease were randomized to CABG (n=957) or PCI (n=948). Costs ($2019) were assessed over 5 years using resource-based costing and Medicare reimbursement rates. Health utilities were assessed using the EuroQOL 5-dimension questionnaire. Five-year EXCEL data in combination with US lifetables were used to develop a Markov model to evaluate lifetime cost-effectiveness. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was considered highly cost-effective. Results: Index revascularization procedure costs were $4,850/patient higher with CABG, and total costs for the index hospitalization were $17 610/patient higher with CABG ($32 297 versus $19 687, P<0.001). Cumulative 5-year costs were $20 449/patient higher with CABG. CABG was projected to increase lifetime costs by $21 551 while increasing quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.49 QALYs, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $44 235/QALY. In a post hoc sensitivity analysis using mortality hazard ratios from a meta-analysis of all randomized CABG versus PCI in left main disease trials, the gain associated with CABG was 0.08 to 0.14 QALYs, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $139 775 to $232 710/QALY gained. Conclusions: Based on data from the EXCEL trial, CABG is an economically attractive revascularization strategy compared with PCI over a lifetime horizon for patients with significant left main coronary artery disease. However, this conclusion is sensitive to the long-term mortality rates with the 2 strategies, and CABG is no longer highly cost-effective when substituting the pooled treatment effect from the 4 major PCI versus CABG trials for left main disease. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01205776.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberE011981
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
E.A. Magnuson reports research support and grants from Abbott Laboratories, Ancora Heart, Corvia, Edwards Lifesciences, Svelte, V-Wave Medical. Dr Serruys has received consulting fees from Novartis, SMT, Philips, Xeltis, and Merillife. Dr Sabik was the Principal Investigator of the EXCEL Trial, sponsored by Abbott. Dr Kappetein is an Employee of Medtronic. Dr Stone has received speaker honoraria from Pulnovo, Infraredx; has served as a consultant to Valfix, TherOx, Robocath, HeartFlow, Ablative Solutions, Vectorious, Miracor, Neovasc, Abiomed, Ancora, Elucid Bio, Occlutech, CorFlow, Apollo Therapeutics, Impulse Dynamics, Vascular Dynamics, Shockwave, V-Wave, Cardiomech, Gore, Amgen; and has equity/options from Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, Valfix, Xenter. Dr Stone’s daughter is an employee at Medtronic. Institutional disclosure: Dr Stone’s employer, Mount Sinai Hospital, receives research support from Abbott, Bioventrix, Cardiovascular Systems Inc, Phillips, Biosense-Webster, Shockwave, Vascular Dynamics, and V-wave. David J. Cohen reports research grant support and consulting income from Edwards LifeSciences, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. The other authors report no conflicts.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Bypass Surgery for Patients with Left Main Disease: Results from the EXCEL Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this