Abstract
Ambiguity and uncertainty inhere in theorizing around the knowledge frontier. Debating the robustness of novel ideas can, therefore, be instrumental in bolstering theory development. As such, I welcome that Haack and Schoeneborn (forthcoming) challenge certain aspects of my recent AMR article (Wijen, 2014). Their critique is two-pronged. First, they argue that my ideas are functionalist and thus incompatible with the social constructionist nature of institutional theory. Second, they contend that I interpret decoupling in a static way, thereby ignoring important dynamics. My response follows the order of these issues.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 310-313 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Academy of Management Review |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |