Covered versus bare-metal stenting of the mesenteric arteries in patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CoBaGI): a multicentre, patient-blinded and investigator-blinded, randomised controlled trial

Luke G. Terlouw*, Louisa J.D. van Dijk, Dutch Mesenteric Ischemia Study Group, Jihan Harki, Suzan Nikkessen, Annemarie C. de Vries, Marco J. Bruno, Luke G. Terlouw*, Louisa J.D. van Dijk, Diederik C. Bijdevaate, Adriaan Moelker, Nicole S. Erler, Nicole S. Erler, Hence J.M. Verhagen, Desirée van Noord, Olaf J. Bakker, Daniel A.F. van den Heuvel, Olaf J. Bakker, Bram Fioole, Dammis VroegindeweijJan Willem Hinnen, Jeroen J. Kolkman, Robert H. Geelkerken, Jeroen J. Kolkman, André S. van Petersen, Henk F.M. Smits, Jean Paul P.M. de Vries, Robert H. Geelkerken, Ron Balm, Olaf J. Bakker, Diederik C. Bijdevaate, Juliette T. Blauw, Gert Jan de Borst, Philip R. Bos, Marco J. Bruno, Hessel C.J.L. Buscher, Louisa J.D. van Dijk, Annet A.M. van Duivenvoorden, Nicole S. Erler, Bram Fioole, Jihan Harki, Duygu Harmankaya, Adriaan Moelker, Suzan Nikkessen, Kaushal Parikh, Luke G. Terlouw*, Hence J.M. Verhagen, Annemarie C. de Vries, Jean Paul P.M. de Vries, Dammis Vroegindeweij, Gijs M.J.M. Welten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Mesenteric artery stenting with a bare-metal stent is the current treatment for atherosclerotic chronic mesenteric ischaemia. Long-term patency of bare-metal stents is unsatisfactory due to in-stent intimal hyperplasia. Use of covered stents might improve long-term patency. We aimed to compare the patency of covered stents and bare-metal stents in patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, patient-blinded and investigator-blinded, randomised controlled trial including patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia undergoing mesenteric artery stenting. Six centres in the Netherlands participated in this study, including two national chronic mesenteric ischaemia expert centres. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible for inclusion when an endovascular mesenteric artery revascularisation was scheduled and a consensus diagnosis of chronic mesenteric ischaemia was made by a multidisciplinary team of gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists, and vascular surgeons. Exclusion criteria were stenosis length of 25 mm or greater, stenosis caused by median arcuate ligament syndrome or vasculitis, contraindication for CT angiography, or previous target vessel revascularisation. Digital 1:1 block randomisation with block sizes of four or six and stratification by inclusion centre was used to allocate patients to undergo stenting with bare-metal stents or covered stents at the start of the procedure. Patients, physicians performing follow-up, investigators, and radiologists were masked to treatment allocation. Interventionalists performing the procedure were not masked. The primary study outcome was the primary patency of covered stents and bare-metal stents at 24 months of follow-up, evaluated in the modified intention-to-treat population, in which stents with missing data for the outcome were excluded. Loss of primary patency was defined as the performance of a re-intervention to preserve patency, or 75% or greater luminal surface area reduction of the target vessel. CT angiography was performed at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post intervention to assess patency. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02428582) and is complete. Findings: Between April 6, 2015, and March 11, 2019, 158 eligible patients underwent mesenteric artery stenting procedures, of whom 94 patients (with 128 stents) provided consent and were included in the study. 47 patients (62 stents) were assigned to the covered stents group (median age 69·0 years [IQR 63·0–76·5], 28 [60%] female) and 47 patients (66 stents) were assigned to the bare-metal stents group (median age 70·0 years [63·5–76·5], 33 [70%] female). At 24 months, the primary patency of covered stents (42 [81%] of 52 stents) was superior to that of bare-metal stents (26 [49%] of 53; odds ratio [OR] 4·4 [95% CI 1·8–10·5]; p<0·0001). A procedure-related adverse event occurred in 17 (36%) of 47 patients in the covered stents group versus nine (19%) of 47 in the bare-metal stent group (OR 2·4 [95% CI 0·9–6·3]; p=0·065). Most adverse events were related to the access site, including haematoma (five [11%] in the covered stents group vs six [13%] in the bare-metal stents group), pseudoaneurysm (five [11%] vs two [4%]), radial artery thrombosis (one [2%] vs none), and intravascular closure device (none vs one [2%]). Six (13%) patients in the covered stent group versus one (2%) in the bare-metal stent group had procedure-related adverse events not related to the access site, including stent luxation (three [6%] vs none), major bleeding (two (4%) vs none), mesenteric artery perforation (one [2%] vs one [2%]), mesenteric artery dissection (one [2%] vs one [2%]), and death (one [2%] vs none). Interpretation: The findings of this trial support the use of covered stents for mesenteric artery stenting in patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia. Funding: Atrium Maquet Getinge Group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-309
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume9
Issue number4
Early online date29 Jan 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2024 Elsevier Ltd

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Covered versus bare-metal stenting of the mesenteric arteries in patients with chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CoBaGI): a multicentre, patient-blinded and investigator-blinded, randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this