Cross-country IPOs: What explains differences in underpricing?

S Banerjee, L (Lili) Dai, K Shrestha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

80 Citations (Scopus)


We study the impacts of country-level information asymmetry, investors'' home-country bias, effectiveness of contract enforcement mechanisms, and accessibility of legal recourse on IPO underpricing in 36 countries around the globe. We find evidence consistent with all four of our hypotheses. First, we find a positive and significant effect of country-level information asymmetry on IPO underpricing. Second, our empirical evidence is consistent with the agency-cost-based explanation of IPO underpricing. We find that lower cost to entice the block holders, measured by domestic investors'' home-country bias, reduces IPO underpricing. Third, we find that effective contract enforcement mechanisms help to reduce IPO underpricing. Finally, we find a positive relation between the accessibility of legal recourse and IPO underpricing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1289-1305
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Corporate Finance
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Research programs

  • EUR ESE 33


Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-country IPOs: What explains differences in underpricing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this