Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cross-diagnostic validity of the SF-36 physical functioning scale in patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A study using Rasch analysis

  • Annet J. Dallmeijer*
  • , Vincent de Groot
  • , Leo D. Roorda
  • , Vera P.M. Schepers
  • , Eline Lindeman
  • , Leonard H. van den Berg
  • , Anita Beelen
  • , Joost Dekker
  • , G. J. Lankhorst
  • , M. J. IJzerman
  • , H. Beckerman
  • , A. J. Prevo
  • , H. J. Stam
  • , E. Odding
  • , B. van Baalen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • VU University Medical Center
  • Center for Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
  • Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus
  • Utrecht University
  • Amsterdam UMC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate unidimensionality and differential item functioning of the SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF10) in patients with various neurological disorders. Patients: Patients post-stroke (n = 198), with multiple sclerosis (n = 151) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 193) participated. Methods: Unidimensionality of the PF10 within the patient groups was investigated by performing a separate Rasch analysis for each group. Differential item functioning was investigated in a pooled Rasch analysis of the 3 groups. Results: Within each group, all items fitted the Rasch model, except the "bathing/dressing" item in the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis group. The pooled analysis showed inadequate fit to the Rasch model for one item ("walking several hundred metres"). Of the other 9 fitting items, 5 showed differential item functioning for stroke vs multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, while no differential item functioning was found between multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Conclusion: All items of the PF10, except one for the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis group, form a unidimensional scale, supporting the use of a sum score as a measure of physical functioning within these diagnostic groups. When comparing the data of patients after stroke, with that of patients with multiple sclerosis and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients, adjustments for differential item functioning are required.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-169
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-diagnostic validity of the SF-36 physical functioning scale in patients with stroke, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A study using Rasch analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this