CT-Colonography vs. Colonoscopy for Detection of High-Risk Sessile Serrated Polyps

JEG IJspeert, CJ Tutein Nolthenius, Ernst Kuipers, ME van Leerdam, CY Nio, Maarten Thomeer, Katharina Biermann, MJ van de Vijver, E Dekker, J Stoker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are suggested to be the precursors of 15-30% of all colorectal cancers (CRCs). Therefore, CRC screening modalities should also be designed to detect high-risk SSPs. We compared computed tomography colonography (CTC) with colonoscopy-based screening for the detection of high-risk SSPs in average-risk individuals. METHODS: Data from a randomized controlled trial that compared CTC with colonoscopy for population screening were used for the analysis. Individuals diagnosed at CTC with a lesion >= 10 mm in size were referred for colonoscopy. Individuals with only 6-9 mm lesions were offered surveillance CTC. This surveillance CTC was followed by a colonoscopy when a lesion >= 6 mm was detected. Yield of both was accumulated to mimic current American College of Radiology CTC referral strategy (referral of individuals with any lesion >= 6 mm). Per participant detection of >= 1 high-risk (dysplastic and/or = 10 mm) SSP was compared with colonoscopy using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 8,844 individuals were invited to participate (in 2: 1 allocation), of which 1,276 colonoscopy and 982 CTC invitees participated in the study. In the colonoscopy arm, 4.3% of individuals were diagnosed with >= 1 high-risk SSP, compared with 0.8% in the CTC arm (odds ratio (OR) 5.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6-11.6; P<0.001). In total, 3.1% of individuals in the colonoscopy arm were diagnosed with high-risk SSPs as most advanced lesion, compared with 0.4% in the CTC arm (OR 7.7; 95% CI 2.7-21.6; P<0.001). The current CTC strategy showed a marked lower detection for especially fl at high-risk SSPs (17 vs. 0), high-risk SSP located in the proximal colon (32 vs. 1), and SSPs with dysplasia (30 vs. 1). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized controlled setting, the detection rate of high-risk SSPs was significantly higher with colonoscopy than CTC. These results might have implications for CTC as a CRC modality for opportunistic screening in average-risk adults.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)516-522
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume111
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Cite this