TY - JOUR
T1 - CT prediction of irresectability in esophageal carcinoma
T2 - Value of additional patient positions and relation to patient outcome
AU - Van den Hoed, R. D.
AU - Feldberg, M. A.M.
AU - Van Leeuwen, M. S.
AU - Van Dalen, T.
AU - Obertop, H.
AU - Kooyman, C. D.
AU - Van der Schouw, Y. T.
AU - De Graaf, P. W.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Background: To improve computed tomographic (CT) prediction of local irresectability and to correlate preoperative CT findings with patient outcome. Methods: Eighty-five patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent CT in supine, left lateral decubitus, and prone positions. CT signs that were indicative of local irresectability included (1) an angle of contact >45°with the aorta; (2) obliteration of triangular fat pad between the tumor, aorta, and spine; (3) tumor contiguous with the aorta in all three positions; and (4) indentation of the airway in all three positions. Results: All CT signs indicative for local irresectability concerning the aorta had comparable percentages of false-positive scans (75%) when correlated with surgical findings. When correlated with pathologic findings, >45°angle of contact with the aorta yielded the fewest false-positive cases (9%). Concerning the airway, additional positions changed the staging correctly in 1 of 18 cases. Median survival was 21 and 8 months, respectively, for tumors considered CT resectable or irresectable. Conclusion: Additional patient positions do not improve the CT prediction of aortic invasion. Predicted resectability correlates with a significant longer life expectancy.
AB - Background: To improve computed tomographic (CT) prediction of local irresectability and to correlate preoperative CT findings with patient outcome. Methods: Eighty-five patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent CT in supine, left lateral decubitus, and prone positions. CT signs that were indicative of local irresectability included (1) an angle of contact >45°with the aorta; (2) obliteration of triangular fat pad between the tumor, aorta, and spine; (3) tumor contiguous with the aorta in all three positions; and (4) indentation of the airway in all three positions. Results: All CT signs indicative for local irresectability concerning the aorta had comparable percentages of false-positive scans (75%) when correlated with surgical findings. When correlated with pathologic findings, >45°angle of contact with the aorta yielded the fewest false-positive cases (9%). Concerning the airway, additional positions changed the staging correctly in 1 of 18 cases. Median survival was 21 and 8 months, respectively, for tumors considered CT resectable or irresectable. Conclusion: Additional patient positions do not improve the CT prediction of aortic invasion. Predicted resectability correlates with a significant longer life expectancy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0031035564
U2 - 10.1007/s002619900157
DO - 10.1007/s002619900157
M3 - Article
C2 - 9013520
AN - SCOPUS:0031035564
SN - 0942-8925
VL - 22
SP - 132
EP - 142
JO - Abdominal Imaging
JF - Abdominal Imaging
IS - 2
ER -