Current concepts in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures: results of a nationwide survey

Tim Schepers, Esther M.M. Van Lieshout, Tessa van Ginhoven, MJ Heetveld, Petr Patka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

108 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures is controversial and randomised clinical trials are scarce. Moreover, the socio-economic cost remains unclear. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence, treatment preferences and socio-economic cost of this complex fracture in the Netherlands. This data may aid in planning future clinical trials and support education. The method of study was of a cross-sectional survey design. A written survey was sent to one representative of both the traumatology and the orthopaedic staff in each hospital in the Netherlands. Data on incidence, treatment modalities, complications and follow-up strategies were recorded. The socio-economic cost was calculated. The average response rate was 70%. Fracture classifications, mostly by Sanders and Essex-Lopresti, were applied by 29%. Annually, 920 intra-articular calcaneal fractures (0.4% incidence rate) were treated, mainly with ORIF (46%), conservative (39%) and percutaneous (10%) treatment. The average non-weight-bearing mobilisation was 9 weeks (SD 2 weeks). An outcome score, mainly AOFAS, was documented by 7%. A secondary arthrodesis was performed in 21% of patients. The socio-economic cost was estimated to be is an element of 21.5-30.7 million. Dutch intra-articular calcaneal fracture incidence is at least 0.4% of all fractures presenting to hospitals. Better insight into treatment modalities currently employed and costs in the Netherlands was obtained.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)711-715
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Orthopaedics
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Research programs

  • EMC MUSC-01-47-01

Cite this