Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Daratumumab for patients with myeloma with early or late relapse after initial therapy: subgroup analysis of CASTOR and POLLUX

  • Andrew Spencer*
  • , Philippe Moreau
  • , Maria Victoria Mateos
  • , Hartmut Goldschmidt
  • , Kenshi Suzuki
  • , Mark David Levin
  • , Pieter Sonneveld
  • , Robert Z. Orlowski
  • , Sung Soo Yoon
  • , Saad Z. Usmani
  • , Katja Weisel
  • , Donna Reece
  • , Tahamtan Ahmadi
  • , Huiling Pei
  • , Wendy Garvin Mayo
  • , Xue Gai
  • , Jodi Carey
  • , J. Blake Bartlett
  • , Robin Carson
  • , Meletios A. Dimopoulos
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Monash University
  • CHU de Nantes
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca
  • University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Japanese Red Cross Medical Center
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Seoul National University College of Medicine
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre
  • Genmab
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

High-risk multiple myeloma (MM) is often defined based on cytogenetic abnormalities, but patients who relapse early after initial therapy are considered a functional high-risk group. In the phase 3 CASTOR and POLLUX studies, daratumumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-Vd) or lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), regardless of cytogenetic risk, and achieved higher rates of complete response or better (≥CR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity vs that with Vd/Rd alone in relapsed/refractory MM. Post hoc analyses of CASTOR and POLLUX evaluated patient subgroups with 1 prior line of therapy based on timing of progression/relapse (early or late) after initiation of first line of therapy. PFS consistently favored the daratumumab-containing regimens across subgroups using both a 24- and 18-month early-relapse cutoff. In the CASTOR/POLLUX pooled data set, daratumumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 65% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.48; P < .0001) in the early-relapse (<24 months) subgroup and by 65% (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.26-0.47; P < .0001) in the late-relapse (≥24 months) subgroup. OS also favored the daratumumab-containing regimens in both the early-relapse (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86; P = .0036) and late-relapse (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.93; P = .0183) subgroups in the pooled population using a 24-month cutoff. Rates of ≥CR and MRD negativity (10-5) were higher with daratumumab vs control, regardless of progression/relapse timing. Although daratumumab is unable to fully overcome the adverse prognosis of early relapse, our results support the use of daratumumab for patients with 1 prior line of therapy, including for those who progress/relapse early after initial therapy and are considered to have functional high-risk MM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)388-398
Number of pages11
JournalBlood Advances
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Daratumumab for patients with myeloma with early or late relapse after initial therapy: subgroup analysis of CASTOR and POLLUX'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this