Deep-Learning-Based Thrombus Localization and Segmentation in Patients with Posterior Circulation Stroke

Riaan Zoetmulder*, Agnetha A.E. Bruggeman, Ivana Išgum, Efstratios Gavves, Charles B.L.M. Majoie, Ludo F.M. Beenen, Diederik W.J. Dippel, Nikkie Boodt, Sanne J. Den Hartog, Pieter J. Van Doormaal, Sandra A.P. Cornelissen, Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos, Josje Brouwer, Wouter J. Schonewille, Anne F.V. Pirson, Wim H. Van Zwam, Christiaan Van Der Leij, Rutger J.B. Brans, Adriaan C.G. Adriaan, Henk A. Marquering

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
35 Downloads (Pure)


Thrombus volume in posterior circulation stroke (PCS) has been associated with outcome, through recanalization. Manual thrombus segmentation is impractical for large scale analysis of image characteristics. Hence, in this study we develop the first automatic method for thrombus localization and segmentation on CT in patients with PCS. In this multi-center retrospective study, 187 patients with PCS from the MR CLEAN Registry were included. We developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) that segments thrombi and restricts the volume-of-interest (VOI) to the brainstem (Polar-UNet). Furthermore, we reduced false positive localization by removing small-volume objects, referred to as volume-based removal (VBR). Polar-UNet is benchmarked against a CNN that does not restrict the VOI (BL-UNet). Performance metrics included the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between automated and manually segmented thrombus volumes, the thrombus localization precision and recall, and the Dice coefficient. The majority of the thrombi were localized. Without VBR, Polar-UNet achieved a thrombus localization recall of 0.82, versus 0.78 achieved by BL-UNet. This high recall was accompanied by a low precision of 0.14 and 0.09. VBR improved precision to 0.65 and 0.56 for Polar-UNet and BL-UNet, respectively, with a small reduction in recall to 0.75 and 0.69. The Dice coefficient achieved by Polar-UNet was 0.44, versus 0.38 achieved by BL-UNet with VBR. Both methods achieved ICCs of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.27–0.54). Restricting the VOI to the brainstem improved the thrombus localization precision, recall, and segmentation overlap compared to the benchmark. VBR improved thrombus localization precision but lowered recall.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1400
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.


Dive into the research topics of 'Deep-Learning-Based Thrombus Localization and Segmentation in Patients with Posterior Circulation Stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this