Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Defining Benchmarks for Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: A Multicentre Analysis of Patients with Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancers

  • Kilian G M Brown
  • , Michael J Solomon
  • , Cherry E Koh
  • , Paul A Sutton
  • , Samuel Aguiar
  • , Tiago S Bezerra
  • , Hamish W Clouston
  • , Ashwin Desouza
  • , Eric J Dozois
  • , Amanda L Ersryd
  • , Frank Frizelle
  • , Jonas A Funder
  • , Julio Garcia-Aguilar
  • , Richard Garfinkle
  • , Tamara Glyn
  • , Alexander Heriot
  • , Yukihide Kanemitsu
  • , Chia Y Kong
  • , Helle Ø Kristensen
  • , Songphol Malakorn
  • David M Mens, Per J Nilsson, Gabriella J Palmer, Emmanouil Pappou, Martha Quinn, Aaron J Quyn, Chucheep Sahakitrungruang, Avanish Saklani, Arne M Solbakken, Jim P Tiernan, Cornelis Verhoef, Daniel Steffens
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • Colorectal & Peritoneal Oncology Centre
  • A.C. Camargo Cancer Centre
  • Tata Memorial Hospital
  • Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery
  • Oslo University Hospital
  • University of Otago (Dunedin)
  • University Hospital of Southern Denmark
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre and Weill Cornell Medicine
  • Department of Surgery
  • National Cancer Center Japan
  • University of Glasgow
  • Aarhus University Hospital
  • Chulalongkorn University
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • St James's University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish globally applicable benchmark outcomes for pelvic exenteration (PE) in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer (LARC) and recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), using outcomes achieved at highly specialised centres.

BACKGROUND DATA: PE is established as the standard of care for selected patients with LARC and LRRC. There are currently no available benchmarks against which surgical performance in PE can be compared for audit and quality improvement.

METHODS: This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing PE for LARC or LRRC at 16 highly experienced centres between 2018 and 2023. Ten outcome benchmarks were established in a lower-risk subgroup. Benchmarks were defined by the 75th percentile of the results achieved at the individual centres.

RESULTS: 

Seven hundred sixty-three patients underwent PE, of which 464 patients (61%) had LARCs and 299 (39%) had LRRCs. Five hundred forty-four patients (71%) who met predefined lower-risk criteria formed the benchmark cohort. For patients with LARC, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤44%; Comprehensive Complication Index: ≤30.2; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤4.3%; R0 resection rate: ≥79%. For patients with LRRC, the calculated benchmark threshold for major complication rate was ≤53%; Comprehensive Complication Index: ≤34.1; 30-day mortality rate: 0%; 90-day mortality rate: ≤6%; R0 resection rate: ≥77%.

CONCLUSIONS: The reported benchmarks for PE in patients with LARC and LRRC represent the best available care for this patient group globally and can be used for rigorous assessment of surgical quality and to facilitate quality improvement initiatives at international exenteration centres.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1118-1126
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume282
Issue number6
Early online date15 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining Benchmarks for Pelvic Exenteration Surgery: A Multicentre Analysis of Patients with Locally Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this