Detection of canine intestinal allograft rejection by in vivo electrophysiologic monitoring1

Maarten A.C. Meijssen*, Erik Heineman, Ron W.F. de Bruin, Fiebo J.W. Ten Kate, Richard L. Marquet, Jan C. Molenaar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of in vivo measurements of electrophysiologic parameters for the detection of canine small bowel (SB) allo-graft rejection. In dogs of group I (n=17) a heterotopic SB autotransplantation was performed. Dogs of group II (n=8) received a heterotopic SB allograft in a fully mismatched donor-recipient combination. No immune-suppression was given. All grafts were monitored regularly by in vivo measurements of transepithelial potential differences (PDs) and by biopsies of the grafts. The overall technical failure rate was 36% caused by thrombosis at the vascular anastomosis in most cases. All successful autografts survived the experimental period and showed physiologic PD responses after stimulation by both a theophylline solution and a glucose solution. The successful allografts survived 5.5±0.2 days (mean ± SEM); the transepithelial PDs showed normal responses at postoperative day 3, but showed decreased responses at day 5 (P<0.05) and reversed responses at day 6 (P<0.05). The diminished PD responses correlated well with the onset of histologic alterations characteristic of rejection. This study demonstrates that serial monitoring of transepithelial PD responses is a non- invasive method to detect acute SB allograft rejection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)955-959
Number of pages5
JournalTransplantation
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1991

Bibliographical note

© Williams & Wilkins 1991. All Rights Reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detection of canine intestinal allograft rejection by in vivo electrophysiologic monitoring1'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this