Developing a decision support tool for the continuation or deprescribing of antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving end-of-life care: Results of a European Delphi study

  • Isabelle Mahé*
  • , Skerdi Haviari
  • , For the DELPHI Serenity Group
  • , Nassima Si Mohammed
  • , Anette Arbjerg Højen
  • , Carme Font
  • , Stavros Konstantinides
  • , Marieke J.H.A. Kruip
  • , Luigi Maiorana
  • , Sebastian Szmit
  • , Denise Abbel
  • , Laurent Bertoletti
  • , Adrian Edwards
  • , Michelle Edwards
  • , Alessandra Gava
  • , Jacobijn Gussekloo
  • , Miriam J. Johnson
  • , Rashmi Kumar
  • , Johan Langendoen
  • , Kate J. Lifford
  • Simon Mooijaart, Mark Pearson, Johanneke Portielje, Kathy Seddon, Stella Trompet, Hélène Helfer, Frederikus A. Klok, Simon Noble, Camille Couffignal
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: 

To develop a European shared decision-support tool (SDST), a two-round Delphi process was used to achieve consensus on aspects relating to the antithrombotic therapy (ATT) deprescribing discussions and process in end-of-life cancer patients. 

Methods: 

Conducted between September 2024 and March 2025, the Delphi survey was developed by a multidisciplinary 24-member steering committee (SC), including medical specialists in oncology, hematology, palliative care, primary care, geriatrics, and vascular medicine. The survey involved 188 experts from these specialties across eight European countries. Consensus was defined with pooled items as ≥70 % agreement with a final decision by the SC. Themes covered deprescribing timing, stakeholders, reassessment and clinical drivers of patients with ATT, SDST, and choice of outcomes for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the SDST. 

Results: 

Round 1 reached consensus for seven pooled questions (37 %), especially the reassessment of ATT deprescribing. Considering these results, the SC reformulated round 2 to reduce ambiguity and move toward consensus. The SC made the final decision. Three medical specialties should be involved in ATT deprescribing: palliative care specialists, oncologists, and general practitioners after a triggering circumstance such as clinical triggers or at 3-month prognosis. For the SDST design, the findings confirmed that this tool would be meaningful to clinicians. Eleven predefined outcomes were selected for a future RCT. 

Conclusion: 

These results succeeded in shaping the content of the future SDST and mapping its useability in palliative care clinical pathways across Europe, with the perspective to support informed decision-making, reduce complications, and improve quality of life in this population.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109573
JournalThrombosis Research
Volume258
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing a decision support tool for the continuation or deprescribing of antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving end-of-life care: Results of a European Delphi study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this