Development and validation of a clinical risk model for postoperative outcome in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a report of the RANO resect group

  • Philipp Karschnia
  • , Jacob S Young
  • , Gilbert C Youssef
  • , Antonio Dono
  • , Levin Häni
  • , Tommaso Sciortino
  • , Francesco Bruno
  • , Stephanie T Juenger
  • , Nico Teske
  • , Jorg Dietrich
  • , Michael Weller
  • , Michael A Vogelbaum
  • , Martin van den Bent
  • , Juergen Beck
  • , Niklas Thon
  • , Jasper K W Gerritsen
  • , Shawn Hervey-Jumper
  • , Daniel P Cahill
  • , Susan M Chang
  • , Roberta Rudà
  • Lorenzo Bello, Oliver Schnell, Yoshua Esquenazi, Maximilian I Ruge, Stefan J Grau, Raymond Y Huang, Patrick Y Wen, Mitchel S Berger, Annette M Molinaro, Joerg-Christian Tonn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Web of Science)
41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Following surgery, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma frequently enter clinical trials. Nuanced risk assessment is warranted to reduce imbalances between study arms. Here, we aimed (I) to analyze the interactive effects of residual tumor with clinical and molecular factors on outcome and (II) to define a postoperative risk assessment tool.Methods The response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) resect group retrospectively compiled an international, seven-center training cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The combined associations of residual tumor with molecular or clinical factors and survival were analyzed, and recursive partitioning analysis was performed for risk modeling. The resulting model was prognostically verified in a separate external validation cohort.Results Our training cohort compromised 1003 patients with newly diagnosed isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype glioblastoma. Residual tumor, O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation status, age, and postoperative Karnofsky Performance Score were prognostic for survival and incorporated into regression tree analysis. By individually weighting the prognostic factors, an additive score (range, 0-9 points) integrating these four variables distinguished patients with low (0-2 points), intermediate (3-5 points), and high risk (6-9 points) for inferior survival. The prognostic value of our risk model was retained in treatment-based subgroups and confirmed in an external validation cohort of 258 patients with glioblastoma. Compared to previously postulated models, goodness-of-fit measurements were superior for our model.Conclusions The novel RANO risk model serves as an easy-to-use, yet highly prognostic tool for postoperative patient stratification prior to further therapy. The model may serve to guide patient management and reduce imbalances between study arms in prospective trials.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbernoae231
Pages (from-to)1046-1060
Number of pages15
JournalNeuro-Oncology
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date4 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and validation of a clinical risk model for postoperative outcome in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a report of the RANO resect group'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this