Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development and Validation of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 Score

  • Otavio T. Ranzani
  • , Mervyn Singer
  • , Jorge I.F. Salluh
  • , Manu Shankar-Hari
  • , David Pilcher
  • , Joana Berger-Estilita
  • , Craig M. Coopersmith
  • , Nicole P. Juffermans
  • , John Laffey
  • , Matti Reinikainen
  • , Ary Serpa Neto
  • , Miguel Tavares
  • , Jean François Timsit
  • , Maria Del Pilar Arias Lopez
  • , Nish Arulkumaran
  • , Diptesh Aryal
  • , Elie Azoulay
  • , Leo Anthony Celi
  • , Dipayan Chaudhuri
  • , Dylan De Lange
  • Jan De Waele, Claudia C. Dos Santos, Bin Du, Sharon Einav, Teresa Engelbrecht, Fathima Fazla, Ricard Ferrer, Stefano Finazzi, Tomoko Fujii, Hayley B. Gershengorn, John D. Greene, Rashan Haniffa, Sicheng Hao, Mohd Shahnaz Hasan, Steve Hollenberg, Mariachiara Ippolito, Christian Jung, Mikhail Kirov, Shigetaka Kobari, Inès Lakbar, Jeffrey Lipman, Vincent Liu, Xiaoli Liu, Suzana M. Lobo, Demetrio Magatti, Greg S. Martin, Barbara Metnitz, Philipp Metnitz, Sheila N. Myatra, Simon Oczkowski, José Artur Paiva, Fathima Paruk, Pirkka T. Pekkarinen, Lise Piquilloud, Anssi Pölkki, Hallie C. Prescott, Annika Reintam Blaser, Ederlon Rezende, Chiara Robba, Bram Rochwerg, Stephane Ruckly, Rasoul Samei, Edward J. Schenck, Paul Secombe, Cornelius Sendagire, Moses Siaw-Frimpong, Andrew J. Simpkin, Márcio Soares, Charlotte Summers, Wojciech Szczeklik, Jukka Takala, Shiro Tanaka, Giovanni Tricella, Jean Louis Vincent, Julia Wendon, Fernando G. Zampieri, Andrew Rhodes, Rui Moreno*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Research Institute of the Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital
  • Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal)
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • University College London
  • Instituto D'or de Pesquisa e Ensino
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society
  • Alfred Health
  • Monash University
  • University of Bern
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • University of Galway
  • Galway University Hospital
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • Austin Health
  • Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
  • Unidade Local de Saúde Santo António
  • University of Porto
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital
  • Argentine Society of Intensive Care (SATI)
  • Hospital de Niños Dr. Ricardo Gutiérrez
  • Nepal Intensive Care Research Foundation
  • Hospital St. Louis
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
  • McMaster University
  • Utrecht University
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • University of Toronto
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
  • Maccabi Healthcare Services
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Nat. Intensive Care Surveillance-M.O.R.U
  • Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
  • IRCCS Istituto di ricerche farmacologiche Mario Negri - Milano, Bergamo, Ranica
  • The Jikei University School of Medicine
  • University of Miami
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Malaya
  • University of Palermo
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • Northern State Medical Academy
  • Graduate School of Medicine
  • Université de Montpellier
  • University of Queensland
  • CHU de Nîmes
  • Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group
  • Hospital de Base
  • Austrian Center for Documentation and Quality Assurance in Intensive Care
  • Medical University of Graz
  • Tata Memorial Hospital
  • Grupo de Investigacão e Desenvolvimento em Infeção e Sépsis
  • University of Pretoria
  • University of Helsinki
  • University of Lausanne
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • University of Tartu
  • Kantonsspital Luzern
  • Serviço de Terapia Intensiva na IAMSPEInstituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual
  • San Martino Hospital Genoa
  • University of Genoa
  • Cornell University
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital Australia
  • Makerere University
  • Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital
  • SFI Insight Centre for Data Analytics
  • University of Cambridge
  • Jagiellonian University Medical College
  • Université libre de Bruxelles
  • King’s College Hospital
  • University of Alberta
  • St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • ULS de São José
  • NOVA University Lisbon
  • University of Beira Interior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Importance: 

Acute dysfunction of vital organs is the hallmark of critical illness. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the most widely adopted approach to describe organ dysfunction, has not been updated in 30 years and therefore may not appropriately capture current clinical practice and outcomes. 

Objectives: 

To inform the data-driven component of an updated score (SOFA-2) in varied geographical and resource settings (stages 6-8) after expert input via a modified Delphi process (stages 1-5). 

Design, Setting, and Participants: 

A federated analysis was performed on data collected from adult patients admitted to 1319 intensive care units (ICUs) in 9 countries (Australia, Austria, Brazil, France, Italy, Japan, Nepal, New Zealand, United States) between 2014 and 2023. Four representative multicenter cohorts containing data from 2098356 patients were used for data-driven score development and internal validation. External validation was performed on 6 cohorts containing data from 1241114 patients. 

Main Outcomes and Measures: 

Content validity for organ dysfunction identified through the modified Delphi process should be reflected by predictive validity using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the score measured on the first ICU day (higher scores indicate worse organ dysfunction). 

Results: 

Of 3.34 million patient encounters, 270108 (8.1%) died in the ICU (range, 4.5% to 20.5% across the 10 cohorts). SOFA-2 modified the 6 organ systems of the original SOFA score (brain, respiratory, cardiovascular, liver, kidney, hemostasis), including new variables and revised thresholds that better describe the organ dysfunction distribution from 0 to 4 points and their associated mortality (SOFA-2 AUROC, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; SOFA-1 AUROC, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81). Evaluation of sequential SOFA-2 data from ICU day 1 to day 7 maintained its predictive validity. Insufficient data and lack of content validity precluded incorporation of gastrointestinal and immune dysfunction scores into SOFA-2. 

Conclusions and Relevance: 

The SOFA-2 score, updated to include contemporary organ support treatments and new score thresholds, describes organ dysfunction in a large, geographically and socioeconomically diverse population of critically ill adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2090-2103
Number of pages14
JournalJAMA
Volume334
Issue number23
Early online date29 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Medical Association.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development and Validation of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 Score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this