TY - JOUR
T1 - Development as freedom
T2 - Taking economics beyond commodities-the cautious boldness of Amartya Sen
AU - Gasper, Des
PY - 2000/11/2
Y1 - 2000/11/2
N2 - Amartya Sen's 1998 Nobel Prize and his recent synthesis of his views in Development as Freedom provide an opportunity to assess his intellectual contribution and style. The paper identifies entitlements analysis and capabilities analysis as the areas which make him stand out for wider audiences from the economists of his generation; and considers the integrative development philosophy which he has constructed around those two areas, centring on the direct and instrumental values of freedom and democracy. Three aspects of Sen's intellectual style are discussed: first, his multi-disciplinarity and fruitful balance between vivid cases, formal theorizing, and policy relevance; second, a preference for gentle persuasion, seen in adoption of evocative but ambiguous, politically safe labels and an avoidance of seeking debate on all fronts (e.g. concerning hyper affluence); third, a continuing project to debate with and influence economists, and hence, while upgrading parts of their inadequate picture of persons, retention of other parts. His capability approach lends itself however to enrichment by deeper analyses of human agency. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
AB - Amartya Sen's 1998 Nobel Prize and his recent synthesis of his views in Development as Freedom provide an opportunity to assess his intellectual contribution and style. The paper identifies entitlements analysis and capabilities analysis as the areas which make him stand out for wider audiences from the economists of his generation; and considers the integrative development philosophy which he has constructed around those two areas, centring on the direct and instrumental values of freedom and democracy. Three aspects of Sen's intellectual style are discussed: first, his multi-disciplinarity and fruitful balance between vivid cases, formal theorizing, and policy relevance; second, a preference for gentle persuasion, seen in adoption of evocative but ambiguous, politically safe labels and an avoidance of seeking debate on all fronts (e.g. concerning hyper affluence); third, a continuing project to debate with and influence economists, and hence, while upgrading parts of their inadequate picture of persons, retention of other parts. His capability approach lends itself however to enrichment by deeper analyses of human agency. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033665448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/1099-1328(200010)12:7<989::AID-JID724>3.0.CO;2-Q
DO - 10.1002/1099-1328(200010)12:7<989::AID-JID724>3.0.CO;2-Q
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033665448
SN - 0954-1748
VL - 12
SP - 989
EP - 1001
JO - Journal of International Development
JF - Journal of International Development
IS - 7
ER -