Diagnostic performances of four commercially available assays for the identification of SARS-CoV-2, influenza type A/B virus and RSV

Cindy Houwen, Nico van Lisdonk, Jelle Bolier, Michelle van Eekeren, Mandy van Gaalen, Aline van Herk, Zaïd Paula, Natasja Peters, Martijn den Reijer, Kelly Mertens, Khoa T.D. Thai*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of 4 commercially NAAT for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA, Influenza type A/B virus and RSV. Included tests were the Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 fast PCR Assay (RNA extraction-free), Allplex™ RV Master Assay, Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 fast MDx Assay (LAMP) and Aptima™ SARS-CoV-2/Flu Assay (RT-TMA). The assays’ performance characteristics were determined using nasopharyngeal swabs from 270 patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection. A total of 215 SARS-CoV-2 positive, 55 negative nasopharyngeal swabs and 19 bacteria strains were included. The sensitivities and specificities for detecting SARS-CoV-2, Influenza type A virus and RSV ranged between 81.8% and 100% with extremely good agreements (κ ≥ 86.8 %). The Aptima™ SARS-CoV-2/Flu Assay introduced a new result parameter, that is, TTime. Here, we showed that TTime may be used as a surrogate for Ct-value. We concluded that all assays assessed in this study can be used for routine detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza type A virus and RSV.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115970
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume106
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic performances of four commercially available assays for the identification of SARS-CoV-2, influenza type A/B virus and RSV'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this