TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential Relapse Patterns After Discontinuation of Entecavir vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic Hepatitis B
AU - Choi, Hannah S.J.
AU - Hirode, Grishma
AU - RETRACT-B study group
AU - Chen, Chien Hung
AU - Su, Tung Hung
AU - Seto, Wai Kay
AU - Van Hees, Stijn
AU - Papatheodoridi, Margarita
AU - Lens, Sabela
AU - Wong, Grace L.H.
AU - Brakenhoff, Sylvia M.
AU - Chien, Rong Nan
AU - Feld, Jordan J.
AU - Sonneveld, Milan J.
AU - Chan, Henry L.Y.
AU - Forns, Xavier
AU - Papatheodoridis, George V.
AU - Vanwolleghem, Thomas
AU - Yuen, Man Fung
AU - Hsu, Yao Chun
AU - Kao, Jia Horng
AU - Cornberg, Markus
AU - Hansen, Bettina E.
AU - Jeng, Wen Juei
AU - Janssen, Harry L.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank all the participating centers, investigators, and research staff for their efforts and contributions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Background and Aims: Whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) differentially affect relapse and outcomes following treatment discontinuation across different patient subpopulations remains unclear. We aimed to compare rates of off-therapy hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, virological and clinical relapse, and retreatment between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who discontinued TDF or ETV therapy. Methods: This study included 1402 virally suppressed CHB patients who stopped either ETV (n = 981) or TDF (n = 421) therapy between 2001 and 2020 from 13 participating centers across North America, Europe, and Asia. All patients were hepatitis B e antigen–negative at treatment discontinuation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the treatment groups. Outcomes were analyzed using survival methods. Results: During a median off-treatment follow-up of 18 months, HBsAg loss occurred in 96 (6.8%) patients overall. Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a higher rate of HBsAg loss (P = .03); however, the association was no longer significant after statistical adjustment (P = .61). Virological relapse occurred earlier among TDF-treated patients (P < .01); nonetheless, rates became comparable after the first year off therapy (P = .49). TDF was significantly associated with a higher clinical relapse rate than ETV throughout follow-up (P < .01). The development of a virological or clinical relapse did not affect the rate of HBsAg loss. Retreatment rates were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Conclusions: TDF and ETV have differential relapse patterns but are associated with similar rates of HBsAg loss and retreatment following discontinuation. Finite therapy can be considered for CHB patients on either TDF or ETV therapy.
AB - Background and Aims: Whether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) differentially affect relapse and outcomes following treatment discontinuation across different patient subpopulations remains unclear. We aimed to compare rates of off-therapy hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, virological and clinical relapse, and retreatment between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who discontinued TDF or ETV therapy. Methods: This study included 1402 virally suppressed CHB patients who stopped either ETV (n = 981) or TDF (n = 421) therapy between 2001 and 2020 from 13 participating centers across North America, Europe, and Asia. All patients were hepatitis B e antigen–negative at treatment discontinuation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the treatment groups. Outcomes were analyzed using survival methods. Results: During a median off-treatment follow-up of 18 months, HBsAg loss occurred in 96 (6.8%) patients overall. Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a higher rate of HBsAg loss (P = .03); however, the association was no longer significant after statistical adjustment (P = .61). Virological relapse occurred earlier among TDF-treated patients (P < .01); nonetheless, rates became comparable after the first year off therapy (P = .49). TDF was significantly associated with a higher clinical relapse rate than ETV throughout follow-up (P < .01). The development of a virological or clinical relapse did not affect the rate of HBsAg loss. Retreatment rates were not significantly different between the treatment groups. Conclusions: TDF and ETV have differential relapse patterns but are associated with similar rates of HBsAg loss and retreatment following discontinuation. Finite therapy can be considered for CHB patients on either TDF or ETV therapy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140776334&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.005
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 35863683
AN - SCOPUS:85140776334
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 21
SP - 1513-1522.e4
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 6
ER -