Disappointing Interobserver Agreement Among Radiologists for a Classifying Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cysts Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Koen Jong, CY Nio, B Mearadji, SS Phoa, MR Engelbrecht, MG Dijkgraaf, Marco Bruno, P Fockens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

64 Citations (Scopus)


Objectives: To assess the degree of interobserver agreement of MRI in the diagnostic assessment of pancreatic cysts (PCs). Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging sets of images of 62 patients with PCs (32 with histological confirmation and 30 with clinical diagnosis) were reviewed by 4 experienced radiologists. Features scored included septations, nodules, solid components, pancreatic duct communication, and wall thickening (>2 mm). Radiologists were asked whether they considered the PC mucinous and if the PC was suspicious for malignancy. Furthermore, they had to choose a classifying diagnosis. Intraclass correlation Results: Interobserver agreement for septations and nodules was fair (ICC, 0.36 and 0.23, respectively). Agreement for the presence of solid components was fair (ICC, 0.23), agreement for communication with the pancreatic duct was moderate (ICC, 0.53), and agreement for wall thickening was moderate (ICC, 0.44). There was fair agreement for the discrimination between mucinous and nonmucinous PC (ICC, 0.36). Agreement was fair (ICC, 0.26) for a classifying diagnosis and fair for the presence of ma Conclusions: Interobserver agreement was poor to moderate for individual PC features, and there was fair agreement for a classifying diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging morphology alone did not allow for a reliable discrimination between different types of PC.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)278-282
Number of pages5
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Research programs

  • EMC MM-04-20-01

Cite this