Disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and molecular subtype: prediction of axillary treatment response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer

the REFINE Study Group, Florien J.G. van Amstel*, Cornelis M. de Mooij, Janine M. Simons, Cristina Mitea, Paul J. van Diest, Patty J. Nelemans, Carmen C. van der Pol, Ernest J.T. Luiten, Linetta B. Koppert, Marjolein L. Smidt, Thiemo J.A. van Nijnatten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

Axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT combined with pathological axillary treatment response has been proposed to guide de-escalation of axillary treatment for clinically node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The aim of this study was to assess whether axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and breast cancer molecular subtype are predictors of axillary pCR. 

Methods: 

This study included clinically node-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the prospective Radioactive Iodine Seed placement in the Axilla with Sentinel lymph node biopsy (‘RISAS’) trial (NCT02800317) with baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging available. The predictive value of axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and breast cancer molecular subtype to estimate axillary pCR was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Discriminative ability is expressed using ORs with 95% confidence intervals. 

Results: 

Overall, 185 patients were included, with an axillary pCR rate of 29.7%. The axillary pCR rate for patients with limited versus advanced baseline axillary disease according to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT was 31.9% versus 26.1% respectively. Axillary disease extent was not a significant predictor of axillary pCR. There were significant differences in axillary pCR rates between breast cancer molecular subtypes. The lowest probability (7%) was found for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2− tumours. Using this category as a reference group, significantly increased ORs of 14.82 for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 40 for hormone receptor−/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 6.91 for triple-negative tumours were found. 

Conclusion: 

Molecular subtype is a significant predictor of axillary pCR after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, whereas axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT is not.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberznae203
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume111
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and molecular subtype: prediction of axillary treatment response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this