Disease-free survival as surrogate for overall survival in esophageal cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy

  • Nicolas Cabrit
  • , Maurice Cheugoua-Zanetsie
  • , the MANATEC-02 collaborative group
  • , Jayne Tierney
  • , Pierre Thirion
  • , Matthew Nankivell
  • , Kathryn Winter
  • , Hong Yang
  • , Bas Wijnhoven
  • , Dewi Vernerey
  • , B. Mark Smithers
  • , Guillaume Piessen
  • , Magnus Nilsson
  • , Jurjen Boonstra
  • , Marc Ychou
  • , Simon Law
  • , David Cunningham
  • , Florent de Vathaire
  • , Michael Stahl
  • , Susan Urba
  • Michele Valmasoni, Danièle Williaume, Janine Thomas, Florian Lordick, Joel Tepper, Val Gebski, Bryan Burmeister, Xavier Paoletti, Johanna van Sandick, Jianhua Fu, Jean Pierre Pignon, Michel Ducreux, Matthieu Faron, Stefan Michiels*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: 

The use of surrogate endpoints may expedite the reporting of study outcomes of clinical trials. The validity of disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in the neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal (E) or gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) carcinomas remains uncertain. 

Objective: 

To evaluate DFS as a surrogate end-point for OS in E/GEJ using the meta-analytical approach Design, setting, and participants: individual patient data from an international meta-analysis on operable locally advanced E/GEJ, which including randomized trials comparing at least two of the neo-adjuvant treatment strategies: upfront surgery (S), chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS), and/or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (CRS). 

Main outcomes and measures: 

Individual (Kendall's tau) and trial-level (R2) correlations between DFS and OS were estimated using a Clayton copula. 

Results: 

DFS and OS data were available for a total of 4518 pts: 2222 pts included in CS vs S, 1908 pts in CRS vs S, and 388 in CS vs CRS comparisons. 3440 patients had a DFS event and 3303 patients died. Kendall's tau was 0.73 [95 % CI 0.71 – 0.75] and R2 trial-level correlation was 0.95 [0.84 – 0.99] for CS vs S, Kendall's tau was 0.76 [0.74 – 0.77] and R2 was 0.96 [0.87 – 0.99] for CRS vs S, Kendall's tau was 0.87 [0.78 – 0.92] and R2 was 0.93 [0.43 – 1] for CRS vs CS. In a multistate model, the median time in the recurrence state was shorter in older vs more recent trials: mean time of 10.8 [10.2 – 11.4] vs 16.5 months [15.4–17.6]. 

Conclusions and relevance:

DFS is a validated surrogate endpoint for OS in trials evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in E/GEJ. DFS may be more useful as an endpoint when delays between recurrences and death become larger.

Original languageEnglish
Article number115292
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume218
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disease-free survival as surrogate for overall survival in esophageal cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this