TY - JOUR
T1 - DNA combing versus DNA spreading and the separation of sister chromatids
AU - Meroni, Alice
AU - Wells, Sophie E.
AU - Fonseca, Carmen
AU - Ray Chaudhuri, Arnab
AU - Caldecott, Keith W.
AU - Vindigni, Alessandro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Meroni et al.
PY - 2024/2/5
Y1 - 2024/2/5
N2 - DNA combing and DNA spreading are two central approaches for studying DNA replication fork dynamics genome-wide at single-molecule resolution by distributing labeled genomic DNA on coverslips or slides for immunodetection. Perturbations in DNA replication fork dynamics can differentially affect either leading or lagging strand synthesis, for example, in instances where replication is blocked by a lesion or obstacle on only one of the two strands. Thus, we sought to investigate whether the DNA combing and/or spreading approaches are suitable for resolving adjacent sister chromatids during DNA replication, thereby enabling the detection of DNA replication dynamics within individual nascent strands. To this end, we developed a thymidine labeling scheme that discriminates between these two possibilities. Our data suggests that DNA combing resolves sister chromatids, allowing the detection of strand-specific alterations, whereas DNA spreading typically does not. These findings have important implications when interpreting DNA replication dynamics from data obtained by these two commonly used techniques.
AB - DNA combing and DNA spreading are two central approaches for studying DNA replication fork dynamics genome-wide at single-molecule resolution by distributing labeled genomic DNA on coverslips or slides for immunodetection. Perturbations in DNA replication fork dynamics can differentially affect either leading or lagging strand synthesis, for example, in instances where replication is blocked by a lesion or obstacle on only one of the two strands. Thus, we sought to investigate whether the DNA combing and/or spreading approaches are suitable for resolving adjacent sister chromatids during DNA replication, thereby enabling the detection of DNA replication dynamics within individual nascent strands. To this end, we developed a thymidine labeling scheme that discriminates between these two possibilities. Our data suggests that DNA combing resolves sister chromatids, allowing the detection of strand-specific alterations, whereas DNA spreading typically does not. These findings have important implications when interpreting DNA replication dynamics from data obtained by these two commonly used techniques.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184403399&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1083/jcb.202305082
DO - 10.1083/jcb.202305082
M3 - Article
C2 - 38315097
AN - SCOPUS:85184403399
SN - 0021-9525
VL - 223
JO - The Journal of cell biology
JF - The Journal of cell biology
IS - 4
M1 - e202305082
ER -