Abstract
This article considers whether survey respondents’ views regarding the likelihood of stock index
returns exceeding specific thresholds are comparable to market views indicated by index options
with strikes at analogous thresholds. It is motivated by the observation that the wording used to
elicit subjective beliefs in surveys about expected future returns resembles the question a purchaser
of a call option might ask. Building on this association, the authors document a similarity between
the views of survey respondents and those of financial market participants as measured through
call options, although the association is not 1-for-1. They find a closer association for those
demonstrating a better understanding of the laws of probability, suggesting that numeracy affects
the accuracy of an elicited response.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 209-220 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Behavioral Finance |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Nov 2017 |