Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Does assisted reproductive technology influence the complexity and associated malformations in esophageal atresia?

  • Federica Pederiva*
  • , Nigel Hall
  • , Esophageal atresia registry participants
  • , Tuktu Soyer
  • , Francesco Morini
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • ASST Settelaghi
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • Hacettepe University
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • Charles University
  • Hannover Medical School
  • Alessandria Children's Hospital
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz
  • Gabriele d'Annunzio University
  • Ospedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi
  • Cairo University
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Brasov Children’s Hospital
  • Stavropol State Medical University
  • Children Teaching Hospital
  • Medical University of Graz
  • University Hospital Frankfurt am Main
  • University of Padua
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • University Children's Hospital, Belgrade
  • University Hospital
  • Karolinska University Hospital
  • Uppsala University
  • IRCCS Ospedale pediatrico Bambino Gesù - Roma
  • Children's Clinical University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: 

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been associated with increased risks of congenital anomalies and preterm birth. However, its role in influencing the complexity of specific malformations, such as esophageal atresia (EA), remains unclear. This study aimed to assess whether ART impacts the phenotypic complexity of EA, including associated anomalies and VACTERL (vertebral, anal, cardiac, tracheoesophageal, renal, and limb anomalies) association. 

Methods: 

Data from 374 EA patients enrolled in the European Pediatric Surgeons’ Association (EUPSA) Esophageal Atresia Registry were analyzed. Patients were grouped based on mode of conception (28 ART and 346 natural conception) and compared for demographics, gestational age, birth weight, associated malformations, VACTERL association, and genetic disorders. 

Results: 

Gestational age and birth weight were comparable between groups (36.5 ± 3.3 vs. 36.4 ± 3.3 weeks, p = 0.42; 2412.3 ± 761.6 g vs. 2601.3 ± 744.3 g, p = 0.24). Maternal age was significantly higher in the ART group. The prevalence of cardiac, gastrointestinal, renal, musculoskeletal, and vertebral anomalies did not differ significantly. All cardiac anomalies in ART patients were minor. VACTERL association rates (25.0% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.398) and genetic disorder prevalence (7.1% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.605) were comparable. 

Conclusions:

ART does not appear to increase the complexity of EA in terms of associated malformations, VACTERL spectrum disorders, or genetic abnormalities. Further studies with larger cohorts and detailed ART subtype data are warranted to confirm these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3429-3434
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Volume42
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does assisted reproductive technology influence the complexity and associated malformations in esophageal atresia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this