Abstract
Subjective well-being research increasingly uses web surveys to understand how subjective well-being indicators are related to other concepts of interest. Although we know that mean scores on these indicators may differ between modes, we know little about whether a move to web will influence the conclusions we draw about our conceptual models. This study uses data from a unique mixed-mode survey collected in Croatia and Germany as part of the Generations and Gender Programme to examine whether the relationships between a range of subjective well-being indicators and a set of objective and subjective determinants differ between respondents answering these questions in face-to-face or web mode. Although respondents report lower subjective well-being in web than in face-to-face mode, the relationships between these variables and a range of objective and subjective indicators are relatively stable across modes. This suggests that substantive conclusions about antecedents of subjective well-being do not depend on whether data are collected via a face-to-face interview or through web survey.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 3441-3461 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of Happiness Studies |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Jul 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The GGP Pilot was funded through the Horizon 2020-project ‘Generations & Gender Programme: Evaluate, Plan and Initiate (GGP EPI)’(Grant Agreement No 739511). We greatly benefitted from the comments by the GGP Pilot team, Martijn Hendriks and the three anonymous reviewers.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
Research programs
- ESSB PSY