Dr. Phil Meets the candidates: How family life and personal experience produce political discussions

Liesbet Van Zoonen*, Floris Muller, Donya Alinejad, Martijn Dekker, Linda Duits, Pauline Van Romondt Vis, Wendy Wittenberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2004, the main contenders in the American presidential election, incumbent Republican president George Bush and Democratic challenger John Kerry, appeared with their wives in two separate episodes of the Dr. Phil show. They talked with America's most popular television therapist about their families and how they combined family life and political career. Campaign and political issues were purposively kept out of the conversations. Analysis of the audience's responses to these two shows, posted on a website, shows that the political relevance of the private and family lives of the candidates was heavily contested. However, the family life and values of the discussants themselves were seen as a legitimate point of departure for their political positions. Thus, the Dr. Phil forum functioned both as a place of deliberation and dialogue, and as a site for articulating political viewpoints.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)322-338
Number of pages17
JournalCritical Studies in Media Communication
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dr. Phil Meets the candidates: How family life and personal experience produce political discussions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this