Dural puncture epidural versus conventional epidural block for labor analgesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

58 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	24-31
Number of pages	8
Journal	International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia
Volume	40
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.007
Publication status	Published - 2019

Research programs

@article{9df290f9efb5497fbe12698e5d456299,

title = "Dural puncture epidural versus conventional epidural block for labor analgesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials",

author = "M Heesen and Koen Rijs and R Rossaint and Markus Klimek",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.007",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "40",

pages = "24--31",

journal = "International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia",

issn = "0959-289X",

publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dural puncture epidural versus conventional epidural block for labor analgesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

AU - Heesen, M

AU - Rijs, Koen

AU - Rossaint, R

AU - Klimek, Markus

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 31281033

SN - 0959-289X

VL - 40

SP - 24

EP - 31

JO - International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

JF - International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia

ER -