Dynamic cine-computed tomography angiography imaging of standard and fenestrated endografts: Differing effects on renal artery motion

Bart E. Muhs, Koen L. Vincken, Arno Teutelink, Eric L.G. Verhoeven, Matthias Prokop, Frans L. Moll, Hence J.M. Verhagen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Different endograft configurations (fenestrated, transrenal, infrarenal) may varyingly affect aortic side branch movement. Renal artery motion was evaluated with 64-slice dynamic cine-computed tomography angiography before and after endovascular aneurysm repair in 16 patients (46 renal arteries). Center-of-mass displacement of the renals was determined per heartbeat for before repair for 3 different endografts; differences were compared, with significance at P <0.5. Preoperative renal artery motion is significant (1.2 [SD 0.5] mm, range, 0.6-2.). Neither transrenal nor infrarenal endografts alter renal artery motion compared with before repair (P <.05). Renal artery motion after fenestrated endovascular repair with renal stents reduces motion to 25% of the preoperative value (0.3 [SD, 0.1] mm, range, 0.2-0.5 mm; P =.01). Endograft implantation without stented side branches does not change renal artery motion, potentially allowing significant movement of the renal artery relative to the fenestration. Routine stenting of fenestrations limits postoperative renal artery motion to 0.3 mm, thereby preventing significant branch movement in relation the fenestration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-31
Number of pages7
JournalVascular and Endovascular Surgery
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic cine-computed tomography angiography imaging of standard and fenestrated endografts: Differing effects on renal artery motion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this