Economic Evaluation of Day Hospital Versus Intensive Outpatient Mentalization-Based Treatment Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial With 36-Month Follow-Up

Mentalization-based treatment (MBT) has demonstrated robust effectiveness in the treatment of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in both day-hospital (MBT-DH) and intensive outpatient MBT (MBT-IOP) programs. Given the large differences in intensity and associated treatment costs, there is a need for studies comparing their cost-effectiveness. A health economic evaluation of MBT-DH versus MBT-IOP was performed alongside a multicenter randomized controlled trial with a 36-month follow-up. In three mental health-care institutions in the Netherlands, 114 patients were randomly allocated to MBT-DH (n = 70) or MBT-IOP (n = 44) and assessed every 6 months. Societal costs were compared with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and the number of months in remission over 36 months. The QALY gains over 36 months were 1.96 (SD =.58) for MBT-DH and 1.83 (SD =.56) for MBT-IOP; the respective number of months in remission were 16.0 (SD = 11.5) and 11.1 (SD = 10.7). Societal costs were e106,038 for MBT-DH and e91,368 for MBT-IOP. The incremental cost for one additional QALY with MBT-DH compared with MBT-IOP was e107,000. The incremental cost for 1 month in remission was almost e3000. Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of e50,000 for a QALY, there was a 33% likelihood that MBT-DH is more costeffective than MBT-IOP in terms of costs per QALY. Although MBT-DH leads to slightly more QALYs and remission months, it is probably not cost-effective when compared with MBT-IOP for BPD patients, as the small additional health benefits in MBT-DH did not outweigh the substantially higher societal costs.