TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective antimicrobial combination in vivo treatment predicted with microcalorimetry screening
AU - Kragh, Kasper Nørskov
AU - Gijón, Desiree
AU - Maruri, Ainhize
AU - Antonelli, Alberto
AU - Coppi, Marco
AU - Kolpen, Mette
AU - Crone, Stephanie
AU - Tellapragada, Chaitanya
AU - Hasan, Badrul
AU - Radmer, Stine
AU - De Vogel, Corné
AU - Van Wamel, Willem
AU - Verbon, Annelies
AU - Giske, Christian G.
AU - Rossolini, Gian Maria
AU - Cantón, Rafael
AU - Frimodt-Møller, Niels
N1 - Funding:
The project was performed in collaboration with Symcel, which developed the calScreener technology. Funding was received from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant 729076).
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Objectives: The worldwide emergence of antibiotic resistance calls for effective exploitation of existing antibiotics. Antibiotic combinations with different modes of action can synergize for successful treatment. In the present study, we used microcalorimetry screening to identify synergistic combination treatments against clinical MDR isolates. The synergistic effects were validated in a murine infection model. Methods: The synergy of meropenem combined with colistin, rifampicin or amikacin was tested on 12 isolates (1 Escherichia coli, 5 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 3 Acinetobacter baumannii) in an isothermal microcalorimeter measuring metabolic activity. One A. baumannii strain was tested with two individual pairings of antibiotic combinations. The microcalorimetric data were used to predict in vivo efficacy in a murine peritonitis/sepsis model. NMRI mice were inoculated intraperitoneally and after 1 h treated with saline, drug X, drug Y or X+Y. Bacterial load was determined by cfu in peritoneal fluid and blood after 4 h. Results: In vitro, of the 13 combinations tested on the 12 strains, 3 of them exhibited a synergistic reduction in MIC (23% n = 3/13), 5 showed an additive effect (38.5% n = 5/13) and 5 had indifferent or antagonistic effects (38.5% n = 5/13). There was a significant correlation (P = 0.024) between microcalorimetry-screening FIC index values and the log reduction in peritoneal fluid from mice that underwent combination treatment compared with the most effective mono treatment. No such correlation could be found between chequerboard and in vivo results (P = 0.16). Conclusions: These data support microcalorimetic metabolic readout to predict additive or synergistic effects of combination treatment of MDR infections within hours.
AB - Objectives: The worldwide emergence of antibiotic resistance calls for effective exploitation of existing antibiotics. Antibiotic combinations with different modes of action can synergize for successful treatment. In the present study, we used microcalorimetry screening to identify synergistic combination treatments against clinical MDR isolates. The synergistic effects were validated in a murine infection model. Methods: The synergy of meropenem combined with colistin, rifampicin or amikacin was tested on 12 isolates (1 Escherichia coli, 5 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 3 Acinetobacter baumannii) in an isothermal microcalorimeter measuring metabolic activity. One A. baumannii strain was tested with two individual pairings of antibiotic combinations. The microcalorimetric data were used to predict in vivo efficacy in a murine peritonitis/sepsis model. NMRI mice were inoculated intraperitoneally and after 1 h treated with saline, drug X, drug Y or X+Y. Bacterial load was determined by cfu in peritoneal fluid and blood after 4 h. Results: In vitro, of the 13 combinations tested on the 12 strains, 3 of them exhibited a synergistic reduction in MIC (23% n = 3/13), 5 showed an additive effect (38.5% n = 5/13) and 5 had indifferent or antagonistic effects (38.5% n = 5/13). There was a significant correlation (P = 0.024) between microcalorimetry-screening FIC index values and the log reduction in peritoneal fluid from mice that underwent combination treatment compared with the most effective mono treatment. No such correlation could be found between chequerboard and in vivo results (P = 0.16). Conclusions: These data support microcalorimetic metabolic readout to predict additive or synergistic effects of combination treatment of MDR infections within hours.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102964392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jac/dkaa543
DO - 10.1093/jac/dkaa543
M3 - Article
C2 - 33442721
AN - SCOPUS:85102964392
SN - 0305-7453
VL - 76
SP - 1001
EP - 1009
JO - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
JF - Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
IS - 4
ER -