Effectiveness of a behaviour graded activity program versus conventional exercise for chronic neck pain patients

Frieke Vonk, Arianne Verhagen, JW Twisk, AJA Koke, Marlies Luiten, Bart Koes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)


Chronic neck pain is a common complaint in the Netherlands with a point prevalence of 14.3%. Patients with chronic neck pain are often referred to physiotherapy and, nowadays, are mostly treated with exercise therapy. It is, however, Unclear which type of exercise therapy is to be preferred. Therefore, this Study evaluates the effectiveness of behaviour graded activity (BGA) compared with conventional exercise (CE) for patients with chronic neck pain. Eligible patients with non-specific chronic neck were randomly allocated to either BGA or CE. Primary treatment Outcome is the patient's global perceived effect concerning recovery from complaint and daily functioning. Outcome assessment was performed at baseline, and at 4, 9, 26, and 52 weeks after randomization. Effectiveness was examined with general estimating equations analyses. Baseline demographics and patient characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. Mean age was 45.7 (SD 12.4) years and the median duration of complaints was 60 months. The mean number of treatments was 6.6 (SD 3.0) in BGA and 11.2 (SD 4.1) in CE. No significant differences between treatments were found in their effectiveness of managing patients with chronic neck pain. Ill both BGA and CE some patients reported recovery from complaints and daily function but the proportion of recovered patients did not exceed 50% during the 12-month follow-up period. Both groups showed clinically relevant improvements in physical secondary outcomes. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN88733332. (C) 2008 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)533-541
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Pain-London
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Research programs

  • EMC NIHES-02-67-01

Cite this