Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of nerinetide in acute ischaemic stroke in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy without previous thrombolysis (ESCAPE-NEXT): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

  • Michael D. Hill*
  • , Mayank Goyal
  • , ESCAPE-NEXT Investigators
  • , Andrew M. Demchuk
  • , Bijoy K. Menon
  • , Thalia S. Field
  • , William C. Guest
  • , Jorg Berrouschot
  • , Albrecht Bormann
  • , Mirko Pham
  • , Karl G. Haeusler
  • , Diedrick W.J. Dippel
  • , Pieter J. van Doormaal
  • , Franziska Dorn
  • , Felix J. Bode
  • , Brian A. van Adel
  • , Demetrios J. Sahlas
  • , Richard H. Swartz
  • , Leodante Da Costa
  • , Johanna M. Ospel
  • Rosalie V. McDonough, Karla J. Ryckborst, Mohammed A. Almekhlafi, Kathy J. Heard, David J. Garman, Corey Adams, Yatika Kohli, Bridget A. Schoon, Brian H. Buck, Mario Muto, Atif Zafar, Hauke Schneider, Jonathan A. Grossberg, Leonard L.L. Yeo, Jason W. Tarpley, Marios Nikos Psychogios, Jonathan M. Coutinho, Nicola Limbucci, Volker Puetz, Michael E. Kelly, Bruce C.V. Campbell, Sven Poli, Alexandre Y. Poppe, Jai J. Shankar, Ronil Chandra, Dar Dowlatshahi, George A. Lopez, Luigi Cirillo, Aimen Moussaddy, Michael Devlin, Pablo Garcia-Bermejo
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Cumming School of Medicine
  • University of Calgary
  • University of British Columbia
  • Klinikum Altenburger Land GmbH
  • University of Würzburg
  • University of Bonn
  • McMaster University
  • Sunnybrook Research Institute
  • NoNO Inc
  • University of Alberta
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Antonio Cardarelli
  • St. Michael's Hospital
  • Klinikum Augsburg
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • National University of Singapore
  • Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center
  • University of Basel
  • Amsterdam UMC, Locatie UvA/AMC
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
  • University of Dresden
  • Saskatchewan Health Authority
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
  • University Hospital Tübingen
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
  • University of Manitoba
  • Monash Medical Centre
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
  • Swedish Medical Center
  • IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna
  • Montreal Neurological Institute
  • The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
  • Hunter New England Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)
40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: In the ESCAPE-NA1 trial, treatment with nerinetide, an eicosapeptide that interferes with post-synaptic density protein 95, was associated with improved functional outcome among patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy without co-treatment with an intravenous thrombolytic agent. There was no benefit when intravenous thrombolytic agent co-treatment was used. We sought to confirm the clinical benefit of nerinetide in the absence of previous intravenous thrombolytic drug treatment. Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, done in 77 centres in Canada (16), the USA (16), Germany (21), Italy (four), the Netherlands (three), Norway (four), Switzerland (three), Australia (eight), and Singapore (two), we enrolled patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 12 h from onset. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with a disabling ischaemic stroke at the time of randomisation (baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score >5), who had been functioning independently in the community (Barthel Index score >90) before the stroke, had Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) greater than 4, and who were not treated with a plasminogen activator. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive intravenous infusion of nerinetide in a single dose of 2·6 mg/kg, up to a maximum dose of 270 mg, based upon estimated or actual weight (if known) or saline placebo using a real-time, dynamic, internet-based, stratified randomised minimisation procedure. All patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy. The primary outcome was a favourable functional outcome 90 days from randomisation, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2. The analysis was by intention to treat and adjusted for time from stroke onset to randomisation (≤4·5 h [yes or no]), age, sex, baseline NIHSS score, occlusion location, time from qualifying imaging to randomisation, baseline ASPECTS, and region. Secondary outcomes were measures of mortality, worsening of stroke, improved functional independence, and measures of neurological disability. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04462536. Findings: From Dec 6, 2020, to Jan 31, 2023, 850 patients were assigned to receive nerinetide (n=454) or placebo (n=396). 206 (45%) participants in the nerinetide group and 181 (46%) participants in the placebo group achieved an mRS score of 0–2 at 90 days (odds ratio 0·97, 95% CI 0·72–1·30; p=0·82). Serious adverse events occurred equally between groups. Interpretation: While nerinetide did not improve outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke, it was not associated with excess adverse events. Further study is needed to identify the ideal timing of treatment and the sub-population of stroke patients who might benefit from treatment combined with current reperfusion therapies. Funding: Canadian Institutes for Health Research and NoNO.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)560-570
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet
Volume405
Issue number10478
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of nerinetide in acute ischaemic stroke in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy without previous thrombolysis (ESCAPE-NEXT): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this