Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy by clinical presentation: Pre-specified analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial

  • the GLOBAL LEADERS Investigators
  • University of Toronto
  • Imperial College London
  • Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Royal Brompton Hospital
  • University of Bern
  • Hasselt University
  • Imelda Hospital
  • IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo - Pavia
  • Sigmund Freud University Vienna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary drug-eluting stent placement in adults with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) versus acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prespecified subgroup analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the experimental or reference strategy, stratified by ACS (experimental, n=3750; reference, n=3737) versus SCAD (experimental, n=4230; reference, n=4251). The experimental strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus 90 mg tica-grelor twice daily for 1 month, followed by 23 months of ticagrelor monotherapy. The reference strategy was 75 to 100 mg aspirin daily plus either 75 mg clopidogrel daily (for SCAD) or 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily (for ACS) for 12 months, followed by aspirin monotherapy for 12 months. The primary end point at 2 years was a composite of all-cause mortality or non-fatal centrally adjudicated new Q-wave myocardial infarction. The key secondary safety end point was site-reported Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding. The primary end point occurred in 147 (3.92%) versus 169 (4.52%) patients with ACS (rate ratio [RR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69–1.08; P=0.189), and in 157 (3.71%) versus 180 (4.23%) patients with SCAD (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71–1.08; P=0.221) with experimental and reference strategy, respectively (P-interaction=0.926). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grade 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 73 (1.95%) versus 100 (2.68%) patients with ACS (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54– 0.98; P=0.037), and in 90 (2.13%) versus 69 (1.62%) patients with SCAD (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.97–1.81; P=0.081; P-interaction=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: While there was no evidence for differences in efficacy between treatment strategies by subgroup, the experimental strategy appeared to reduce bleeding risk in patients with ACS but not in patients with SCAD. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01813435.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere015560
JournalJournal of the American Heart Association
Volume10
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
GLOBAL LEADERS is an investigator-initiated trial sponsored by the European Clinical Research Institute (www.ECRI-trials.com), which received funding from 1 device (Biosensors International Ltd, Europe) and 2 drug manufacturers (Astra Zeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; The Medicines Company, Parsippany, New Jersey).

Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy by clinical presentation: Pre-specified analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this