TY - JOUR
T1 - End-of-life care decision-making from perspectives of patients, family members and healthcare professionals in 10 countries
T2 - a qualitative study within the iLIVE project
AU - Kodba-Čeh, Hana
AU - Lunder, Urška
AU - Ásgeirsdóttir, Guðlaug Helga
AU - Barnestein-Fonseca, Pilar
AU - Bakan, Miša
AU - Faksvåg Haugen, Dagny
AU - Halfdanardottir, Svandis Iris
AU - Joshi, Melanie
AU - McGlinchey, Tamsin
AU - Romarheim, Elisabeth
AU - Tripodoro, Vilma A.
AU - Veloso, Verónica I.
AU - Víbora Martín, Eva
AU - van der Heide, Agnes
AU - Zambrano, Sofía C.
AU - Yildiz, Berivan
AU - Rasmussen, Birgit H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025/1/13
Y1 - 2025/1/13
N2 - Patients and families facing the end of life deal with constant health changes, making their ongoing involvement in care decisions vital yet often overlooked. The iLIVE project conducted a qualitative study across 10 countries, exploring the experiences of patients, family members, and healthcare professionals, enabling a comprehensive exploration of the experiences of end-of-life decision-making. The findings suggest that common emotionally driven motives among patients–to avoid suffering, to have agency and be engaged with others, to give and receive care–significantly drive decision-making. Secondly, patients and families need support in determining what is best for them over time, minimising unnecessary uncertainty through subtle communication that requires skills and time, considering multiple motives, and the likely future, while also acknowledging its inherent uncertainty. This frames decision-making as a process to determine the most optimal course of actions in a specific context to meet these needs as much as possible and cope with the distress arising from growing challenges to do so. However, these needs are often marginalised in settings dictated by systemic and contextual characteristics, heightening distress for everyone involved. The complexity of end-of-life decision-making, particularly when time is limited, poses challenges in finding the right focus, yet it remains imperative.
AB - Patients and families facing the end of life deal with constant health changes, making their ongoing involvement in care decisions vital yet often overlooked. The iLIVE project conducted a qualitative study across 10 countries, exploring the experiences of patients, family members, and healthcare professionals, enabling a comprehensive exploration of the experiences of end-of-life decision-making. The findings suggest that common emotionally driven motives among patients–to avoid suffering, to have agency and be engaged with others, to give and receive care–significantly drive decision-making. Secondly, patients and families need support in determining what is best for them over time, minimising unnecessary uncertainty through subtle communication that requires skills and time, considering multiple motives, and the likely future, while also acknowledging its inherent uncertainty. This frames decision-making as a process to determine the most optimal course of actions in a specific context to meet these needs as much as possible and cope with the distress arising from growing challenges to do so. However, these needs are often marginalised in settings dictated by systemic and contextual characteristics, heightening distress for everyone involved. The complexity of end-of-life decision-making, particularly when time is limited, poses challenges in finding the right focus, yet it remains imperative.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85214934508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13576275.2025.2449900
DO - 10.1080/13576275.2025.2449900
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85214934508
SN - 1357-6275
JO - Mortality
JF - Mortality
ER -